the Continuing Crisis
Margin Clerks of the World, Unite!
Where Do We Find New Sources of Credit?
In Defense of Alan Greenspan
What Now for Gold, Oil, Etc? Baseball, Mexico, and Travel Costs
My essay in Outside the Box last Monday
seemed to ignite a lot of response in the blogosphere. My basic contention was
that the Fed had to act to facilitate the sale of Bear to prevent a meltdown in
the markets. Many agreed, but others said Bear should have been left to hang,
pointing out that a thorough cleansing is what is needed. Others scoffed at the
notion that allowing Bear to fail would have created a massive stock market
sell-off. This week we will reexamine that concept, look at the drop in gold
and commodities, come to the defense of Alan Greenspan (which should be food
for a little more controversy), and think through to the end game of the
But first, a little housekeeping. There is now a Spanish
version of www.johnmauldin.com.
For those who care, you can click on the tab in the upper right. We hope to
soon be able to offer the letter in Spanish, in addition to the current
translation in Chinese.
Secondly, as we announced a few weeks ago, I am now working
with my friend Steve Blumenthal and his team at CMG to offer a variety of
investment managers who can work with investors with less than the $1.5 million
needed to be classified as an accredited investor. I am proud of the managers
we have on the platform. To see the managers and their returns, and how they
are doing lately in this turmoil, just click on the following link and fill out
the simple form. The minimum account size is $100,000. http://cmgfunds.net/public/mauldin_questionnaire.asp
Some have written that they filled out the form and have
not been called by CMG. There was a rather large initial response. I suggest
that you call after you fill out the form. They will get to you eventually, but
a call will speed up the process. And of course, if you are an accredited
investor you can go to www.accreditedinvestor.ws as always, and my
partners will be glad to show you the world of commodity and hedge funds. (In
this regard, I am president and a registered representative of Millennium Wave
Securities, LLC. Member FINRA.) So, without further interruption, let's get to
this week's letter.
"If it was 2005, Bear would have been allowed to
collapse, as the system back then could deal with it, as it did with REFCO. But
it is not 2005. We are in a credit crisis, a perfect storm, which is of
unprecedented proportions. If Bear had not been put into sound hands and
provided solvency and liquidity, the credit markets would simply have frozen
this morning. As in ground to a halt. Hit the wall. The end of the world,
impossible to fathom how to get out of it type of event.
"The stock market would have crashed by 20% or more,
maybe a lot more. It would have made Black Monday in 1987 look like a picnic.
We would have seen tens of trillions of dollars wiped out in equity holdings
all over the world.
"... Yes, taxpayers may eventually have to cover a few
billion here or there on the Bear action. But the time to worry about moral
hazard was two years ago when the various authorities allowed institutions to
make subprime loans to people with no jobs and no income and no means to repay
and then sold them to institutions all over the world as AAA assets. And we can
worry in the near future when we will need to do a complete rewrite of the
rules to prevent this from happening again.
"But for now, we need to bail the water out the boat
and see if we can plug the leaks. Allowing the boat to sink is not an option.
And get this. You are in the boat, whether you realize it or not. You and your
friends and neighbors and families. Whether you are in Europe or in Asia, you
would have been hurt by a failure to act by the Fed. Everything is connected in
a globalized world. Without the actions taken by the Fed, the soft depression
that many have thought would be the eventual outcome of the huge build-up of
debt would in fact become a reality. And more quickly than you could
Margin Clerks of the World, Unite!
Let's look at how a market crash would have actually
happened. First, all credit to Bear would have been shut off. Immediately,
anyone (hedge funds and banks) who needed Bear to provide loans, prime
brokerage, leverage, etc. would have lost access to their cash.
And since other lenders and banks would not know who had
exposure to Bear, banking and lending would have ground to a halt. If you don't
know what your capital position is, you cannot lend, and you certainly don't
lend to someone if you don't know their position.
In all likelihood, Bear would have been forced to raise
capital as rapidly as possible. This means margin calls to their client firms
with basically solid credit, as they would have to reduce their credit
exposure. But when the margin clerk calls, you don't get to sell what you want.
Sometimes you simply have to sell what you can. And since loans and credit
assets would not be liquid, that means selling stocks and commodities.
But the margin clerks at other banks would look to see what
exposure to Bear their customers had. Any exposure would mean that customer had
to provide more margin capital immediately. If none was forthcoming, then the
none-too-gentle hand of the margin clerk would start selling. You don't want to
be the last one in line to get your money.
Why? Because the other banks would have to protect their
capital positions. If the Fed would allow Bear to go down, then it would only
be a matter of time before others followed. So raise as much capital, call as
many loans, and reduce leverage as quickly as you can.
The market would have opened down enough to trigger the
so-called circuit breakers. That would not reduce panic, but simply give the
margin clerks more time to make phone calls.
I can see that hand! The question is why wouldn't people
see great values and jump in? Because any astute trader would wait for the
falling knife to hit the floor before deciding to pick it up. As long as there
is massive forced selling, the price of anything is going to drop.
And absent of an orderly credit market, getting margin
money to buy with would have been difficult. And as the market fell, more
capital would have been demanded from hedge funds and other leveraged players,
which would have meant even more forced selling. It would have been a vicious
Now, if you were short going into Monday morning, you were
not happy with the Fed, as they took money out of your pocket. But I can
guarantee you that a forced sale that happened over 48 hours would not have
come about unless the authorities were alarmed beyond what one can imagine.
The Fed had to make guarantees to get the deal done. JP
Morgan had no time to do any sort of due diligence on the assets beyond agreeing
to a $6 billion write-down, which was the true cost of Bear. Now, if there had
been time for an orderly liquidation, Bear shareholders might have gotten more
value. Maybe. But there was no time. The systemic risk to the global financial
markets was deemed to be too great.
"The Fed risking a few billion here and there to keep
the boat afloat is the best trade possible today. Their action saved trillions
in losses for investors all over the world. It is a relatively small price. If
you want to be outraged, think about the multiple billions in subsidies for
ethanol and the hundreds of billions of so-called earmarks over the past few
years to build bridges to nowhere. And think of the billions in lost tax
revenue that would result from the ensuing crisis. I repeat, this was a good
trade from almost any perspective, unless you are from the hair-shirt,
cut-your-nose-off-to-spite-your-face camp of economics."
The Fed simply bought time for an orderly liquidation. And
it is going to take some time to get back to functioning debt markets and
normal mortgage credit markets. The problem of bad mortgages being written off
by a host of institutions is still with us. We will see hundreds of billions of
dollars of write-offs more than we have seen so far. But just as with the Latin
American defaults on bonds in the '80s, time will eventually allow the banks to
And this brings up a point I have been making for quite
awhile. We have vaporized 60% or more of the funds that bought debt in the last
eight months. They are not coming back. We are going to have to create whole
new ways of securitizing and funding debt of all types, but especially
mortgages and consumer credits. While I have confidence that those intrepid
bankers on Wall Street will figure out something, as their future bonuses
depend on it, it is going to take time to replace a system that took decades to
Where Do We Find New Sources of Credit?
Average US consumers have seen their incomes rise very little in real
terms over the past six years, for a variety of reasons. They maintained their
spending patterns with debt of all types, and specifically mortgage equity
withdrawals. That source is going away. Consumer spending is going to come
under pressure, and with it the earnings of many corporations and businesses.
The problems that created the current crisis and the
incipient recession cannot simply be solved with lower interest rates. It is
going to take several years to work off the excess inventory in the housing
markets. It will take at least as long to get the credit markets functioning
As an investor or business, you need to plan for a rather
long period of slack demand and slow growth, and think through how you will be
affected. I have begun to think what the world will look like in a few years,
and will write about that in future letters.
Clearly, we are going to have to create new ways to analyze
credit. As Peter Bernstein points out in a recent letter, liquidity is
partially a function of trust. If you believe something is AAA, you can buy it
without a lot of research. The better the credit, the more liquid it is. But
absent that trust, you have to do your own research. That takes time and money.
And it slows the process down. And it means risk is priced differently and at a
I think we could see the formation of a lot of new credit
funds (I don't think they could properly be called hedge funds). It was only a
few years ago that small public companies went to regional broker dealers to
raise capital. Those days are gone. Now, if a small company wants to raise
capital, they go to specialized hedge funds called PIPE funds, which stands for
Private Investment in Public Equities. It is a lot more efficient and, aside
from some problems from time to time, works quite well.
It used to be that to get a loan you sat down with your
banker face to face, and they knew you. The problem with today's credit markets
is that credit was given to many people who clearly should not have been able
to get loans. If it had been their personal money, any reasonable person would
not have given a loan against 100% of a home without at least ascertaining if
the person could actually make the payments.
But if you can get a nice juicy commission by lending
someone else's money to people you do not know and have no responsibility for,
then greed kicks in and you get the subprime crisis.
Maybe we see the formation of funds that step in to do
lending the old-fashioned way. They actually look at the quality of the credit.
They put some skin in the game (their risk capital) in order to securitize the
debt. And the rules of lending become very transparent. It is not clear what
the actual form will take, but something like that is going to be what we see
in a few years. More transparency and actual risk on the part of the
agency/fund/group that makes the loan will be the order of the new day.
In Defense of Alan Greenspan
Alan Greenspan is routinely blamed in many circles for
creating the housing bubble. It was his keeping rates too low, we are assured,
that was responsible for the run-up in home prices. Now, he probably did keep
rates too low for too long, but I am not certain that we can lay the blame at
his feet. He had a lot of help.
First, a point made by Peter Bernstein. Housing prices rose
by almost 50% from 1998 to 2001, before Greenspan started on his rate-cutting
binge. 50% in three years when the Fed funds rate was over 6% is not exactly
encouragement from the Fed to buy homes. It seems people were ready to do it
without low rates. So, a good part of the bubble was not due to lower rates.
And home prices continued to rise rather sharply, even as
the Fed began to raise rates in 2005-6. We built 3.5 million more homes over
the last ten years than the trend growth suggested we needed. They were not all
built during the period of low interest rates.
While low rates did help, the bubble was aided and abetted
by sloppy lending practices. It now looks like some two million people took out
loans they are going to have difficulty repaying, and are likely headed for
foreclosure. Rating agencies labeled these loans as AAA credits. Mortgage and
investment bankers sold them to all manner of institutions.
All these culprits took advantage of the low rates, but
that was not the cause of the bubble. If proper lending practices had been
followed, there would have been far fewer buyers and less building, less
speculation, and so on.
Greenspan, in hindsight, should have raised rates sooner,
which I said at the time. And lower rates did make homes more affordable. No
question about that. But to lay the blame for the housing bubble at his feet is
not entirely fair. He had a lot of helpers who did the really heavy lifting.
What Now for Gold, Oil, Etc?
Just a few quick thoughts about the drop in commodity
prices we saw this week. First, it was about time. Gold and other commodities
went too far, too fast in a largely speculative frenzy. A correction was
overdue. Gold saw the largest one-day drop in 28 years, since the bubble days
of the '80s. When everyone is on the same side of the boat, the boat is likely
to tip over. Gold still probably has some room to fall before it catches
support. But I seriously doubt that we have seen the highs for gold against a
whole host of paper currencies.
A few weeks ago, I sent you an article by David Galland on
why the gold stocks have not kept up with gold. For those of you who want to
put some of your assets into gold, I would use this pullback to get positioned.
If you have not yet read it, click on the following link and see why David
thinks gold stocks are getting ready to rise. http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/txt/jmotb022508.htm
But we could continue to see pull-backs in other commodities.
China is getting serious about curbing inflation, and that means
they need to slow down their economy, raise rates, and allow the yuan to rise.
They increased the requirements for bank margins this week. Along with a
slowing US consumer and generally slower US economy, which will be felt worldwide, we could see
commodity prices come under pressure before a growing world increases demand.
Part of the reason is that the dollar is no longer a
one-way play. A falling dollar may no longer lead inevitably to higher oil and
And Greg Weldon makes a strong case that oil prices are set
to come down from their lofty highs. Demand is softening and supplies are
rising. Gasoline supplies are at a multi-decade high, and the number of days of
supply is rising as well. This is quite bearish for oil.
It also means that the inflation caused by food and energy
might actually subside, giving the Fed cover to lower rates again at their next
meeting, which I think they will do.
Falling demand is what you should expect in a recession,
especially with prices as high as they are.
Baseball, Mexicoand Travel Costs
It's time to hit the send button. It's a Friday night. I am
working a little late, but I have to admit there is a distraction. They are
letting some of the local high school teams play in the Texas Ranger baseball
park, and it is nice to hear the sound of a bat on a ball, even if it is a
metal bat. Spring has officially arrived.
Given that the Dallas Mavericks have not beaten a team with
a winning record since the Jason Kidd trade, it is probably good that baseball
is just around the corner. It does not look like we will go very deep into the
Speaking of inflation, is it just me or have airfares gone
crazy? American Airlines wanted $2,000 for a round trip from Dallas to Orlando two weeks before departure. I am used to paying a few
hundred for that flight. I flew Southwest, but they still wanted $500. Cancun is
normally a few hundred. To get the flights I needed, it was $1100. The cheapest
we could find was about $600, if you wanted to get up at in Cancun. Ugh. I will pass.
I don't even want to talk about the fares to Europe and South Africa. Yes, I do fly business class over the pond, but the cost
is way up. I wonder how the Commerce Department figures out the cost of travel
in the inflation numbers. Their numbers don't square with my costs.
Let me wish everyone a very happy Easter. This is a time to
be with family and friends and reflect on our lives and realize the grace that
is given to us.
Your wondering when Jason Kidd is going to kick-start the
Note: The generic Accredited Investor E-letters are not an offering for
any investment. It represents only the opinions of John Mauldin and Millennium
Wave Investments. It is intended solely for accredited investors who have
registered with Millennium Wave Investments and Altegris Investments at www.accreditedinvestor.ws or directly related
websites and have been so registered for no less than 30 days. The Accredited
Investor E-Letter is provided on a confidential basis, and subscribers to the
Accredited Investor E-Letter are not to send this letter to anyone other than
their professional investment counselors. Investors should discuss any
investment with their personal investment counsel. John Mauldin is the President
of Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA), which is an investment advisory firm
registered with multiple states. John Mauldin is a registered representative of
Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, (MWS), an FINRA registered
broker-dealer. MWS is also a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and a Commodity
Trading Advisor (CTA) registered with the CFTC, as well as an Introducing
Broker (IB). Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of MWA LLC and MWS LLC.
Millennium Wave Investments cooperates in the consulting on and marketing of
private investment offerings with other independent firms such as Altegris
Investments; Absolute Return Partners, LLP; Pro-Hedge Funds; EFG Capital
International Corp; and Plexus Asset Management. Funds recommended by Mauldin
may pay a portion of their fees to these independent firms, who will share 1/3
of those fees with MWS and thus with Mauldin. Any views expressed herein are
provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way
as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest with any CTA, fund, or
program mentioned here or elsewhere. Before seeking any advisor's services or
making an investment in a fund, investors must read and examine thoroughly the
respective disclosure document or offering memorandum. Since these firms and
Mauldin receive fees from the funds they recommend/market, they only
recommend/market products with which they have been able to negotiate fee
Forex Trading News
Daily Forex Market News Forex news reports can be found on the forex research
headlines page below. Here you will find real-time forex market news reports
provided by respected contributors of currency trading information. Daily forex
market news, weekly forex research and monthly forex news features can be found
Forex News Real-time forex market news reports and features providing
other currency trading information can be accessed by clicking on any of the
headlines below. At the top of the forex blog page you will find the latest
forex trading information. Scroll down the page if you are looking for less
recent currency trading information. Scroll to the bottom of fx blog headlines
and click on the link for past reports on forex. Currency world news reports
from previous years can be found on the left sidebar under "FX Archives."
Elevate Your Trading With The Amazing Trader!
The Amazing Trader includes:
Actionable trading levels delivered to YOUR charts in real-time.
looking for your first broker or do you need of a new one? There are
more critical things to consider than you might have thought.
We were trading long before there were online brokers. Global-View
has been directly involved with the industry since its infancy. We've
seen everything and are up-to-data with recent regulatory changes.
The Global-View Forex Forum is the hub for currency trading on the web. Founded in 1996, it was the original forex forum and is still the place where forex traders around the globe come 24/7 looking for currency trading ideas, breaking forex news, fx trading rumors, fx flows and more. This is where you can find a full suite of forex trading tools, including a complete fx database, forex chart points, live currency rates, and live fx charts. In addition, there is a forex brokers directory where you can compare forex brokers. There is also a forex brokers hotline where you can ask for help choosing a forex broker that meets your individual fx trading needs. Interact on the same venue to discuss forex trading.
The forex forum is where traders come to discuss the forex market. It is one of the few places where forex traders of all levels of experience, from novice to professionals, interact on the same venue to discuss forex trading. There is also the GVI Forex, which is a private subscription service where professional and experienced currency traders meet in a private forex forum. it is like a virtual forex trading room. This is open to forex traders of all levels of experience to view but only experienced currency tradingprofessionals can post.
Currency trading charts are updated daily using the forex trading ranges posted in the Global-View forex database. You will also find technical indicators on the fx trading charts, e.g. moving averages for currencies such as the EURUSD. This is another forex trading tool provided by Global-View.com.
The forex database can be used to access high, low, close daily forex ranges for key currency pairs, such as the EURUSD, USDJPY, USDCHF, GBPUSD, USDCAD, AUD, NZD and major crosses, including EURJPY, EURGBP, EURCHF, GBPJPY, GBPCHF and CHFJPY. Data for these currency trading pairs dating back to January 1, 1999 can be downloaded to an Excel spreadsheet.
Forex chart points are in a currency trading table that includes; latest fx tradinghigh-low-close range, Bollinger Bands, Fibonacci retracement levels, daily forex pivot points support and resistance levels, average daily forex range, MACD for the different currency trading pairs. You can look on the forex forum for updates when one of the fx trading tools is updated.
Global-View also offers a full fx trading chart gallery that includes fx pairs, such as the EURUSD, commodities, stocks and bonds. In a fx trading world where markets are integrated, the chart gallery is a valuable trading tool. Look for updates on the Forex Forum when the chart gallery is updated.
Global-View.com also offers a forex blog, where articles of interest for currency trading are posted throughout the day. The forex blog articles come from outside sources, including forex brokers research as well as from the professionals at Global-View.com. This forex blog includes the Daily Forex View, Market Chatter and technical forex blog updates. In additional to its real time forex forum, there are also Member Forums available for more in depth forex trading discussions.
WARNING: FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRADING AND INVESTMENT IN DERIVATIVES
CAN BE VERY SPECULATIVE AND MAY RESULT IN LOSSES AS WELL AS PROFITS. FOREIGN
EXCHANGE AND DERIVATIVES TRADING IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MANY MEMBERS OF THE
PUBLIC AND ONLY RISK CAPITAL SHOULD BE APPLIED. THE WEBSITE DOES NOT TAKE
INTO ACCOUNT SPECIAL INVESTMENT GOALS, THE FINANCIAL SITUATION OR SPECIFIC
REQUIREMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL USERS. YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER YOUR FINANCIAL
SITUATION AND CONSULT YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISORS AS TO THE SUITABILITY TO YOUR
SITUATION PRIOR TO MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR ENTERING INTO ANY TRANSACTIONS.