Saturday September 13, 2008 - 09:27:22 GMT
Share This Story
Thoughts from the Frontline - www.frontlinethoughts.com/learnmore
FX Blog - Housing: Are We at the Bottom?Housing: Are We at the Bottom
September 12, 2008
The Headwinds to Growing Your Wealth
The Wealth of Nations
Housing: Are We at the Bottom?
Alt-A is the New Subprime
3.5 Million Unemployed and Counting
La Jolla, South Africa and London
This week we look at the housing market in some
detail. When can we expect it to turn around? Part of the problem is that a new
wave of foreclosures is coming due, and this time it is not subprime. And that
means more problems for the large financial companies. Also, as predicted here,
consumer spending is taking a hit as consumers are finding it increasingly
difficult to get credit and a deteriorating labor market is dragging down total
spending. There are some very interesting details in the data that was released
this week. And we take a quick peek at the outlook for inflation. What is in
the pipeline, so to speak? It should make for an interesting letter.
But first, it is finally time to make a very
special announcement. Readers are aware that we have been asking you to
take a survey on your financial and personality profiles. We are grateful for
your response. Tiffani said that she has that nervous/excited feeling you
get right before a long-anticipated moment that makes your heart race a
little faster. In early summer of next year, we will be releasing our
first book written together, to be called Eavesdropping on
The data we are getting is simply
amazing. I have seen nothing like it. And to make it more than just a book of
numbers, over the next few months Tiffani and I will spend countless hours
interviewing millionaires about their personal journeys, philosophies,
investments, business successes and woes, lessons learned, families and
lifestyles. So far, we have had over 1,000 millionaires (net of their
homes) volunteer for the interview. This is the fun part! Listening
and exchanging life stories with other people has to be one of
the most satisfying and connecting joys of our lives. We plan on doing a
series of books, so these interviews will go on for the next year, at the very
As you know, I consider my readers to be above par in their
insightful feedback (supportive or critical) and intelligence.
Tiffani agrees; and we want to know, if you could sit in a room with these
millionaires and ask anything, what would you would
want to ask? Please send any and all suggestions to us at
And I mean anything; no question is too generic or outlandish for us to
Not only have we had over 1,000
requests for interviews, we have had over 7,000 millionaires (so far)
take our extensive survey, out of a total of 16,342, with over 25% coming from
outside the US. We have not been able to find a survey done in the
past ten years with even half that number! (If you know of any
surveys or articles that you think we might have missed, send those along to
the above email as well.)
Let me tell you how fascinating it
is to start digging into this data. We are comparing our data with other
books, surveys, and articles we are researching, not only confirming things we
already know but, now, we are finding new and important information.
If you haven't taken the survey yet
and want to participate in this research (and we want everyone to take it, as
you don't have to be a millionaire - if you are reading this you can take it),
please visit: http://survey.frontlinethoughts.com/index.php?sid=12431&lang=en
The Headwinds to Growing Your
One thing that I find interesting in our
research will help me illustrate a very important point I have made in the past
few months, and that is the difficult headwinds that people are going to have
in their efforts to grow their investment portfolios.
In The Millionaire Next Door,
written in 1996, it was stated that 3.5 million households in America
(out of a total 100 million households) had a net worth of $1 million
Millionaire households accounted for nearly half of all the private
wealth in America.
During the ten-year period from
1996 through 2005, the authors projected the wealth held by American households
to grow nearly six times faster than the household population. Quoting: "By the
year 2005 the total net worth of American households will be $27.7 trillion or
more than 20 percent higher than in 1996."
As it turns out, the numbers are
far better. Today there are 9.2 million households worth more than $1 million,
not including the value of their primary residence. The net worth is almost
double their estimate. However, the numbers of new millionaires grew by 21% in
2004, 11% in 2005, 8% in 2006 and 2% in 2007. Can you see a trend here?
fact, this year it may even
reverse. If you go the Federal Reserve data, you find that US national
net worth has dropped by over $2 trillion in the two quarters ended
(that is the latest data). Given the continued drop in home prices and
stock market, it is likely those losses will mount. (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/Current/z1r-5.pdf)
Now, it is not all bad news. We
still have total assets of $70 trillion against liabilities of $14.5 trillion.
However, much of that wealth is concentrated in the hands of the wealthy, and
the real imbalance is in lower-income households. And cash savings are rising
at a healthy pace for a change.
The Wealth of Nations
Now, let's review a few factors as to why I think
it is going to be harder to get that millionaire status over the next decade
than it has been in the past. From 1981 to 2006, our national wealth in terms
of the houses we own, stocks we own, real estate, bonds, businesses -
everything - our net national wealth (or maybe it's better to say, the prices
we put on our assets) grew from $10 trillion to $57 trillion. Over very long
periods of time, national wealth is by definition a mean-reversion machine.
Over 40 or 50 years, national wealth has to revert to the growth in nominal
GDP. That's just the way the economics and the math work out.
Basically, the principle is that trees cannot grow
to the sky. Just as total corporate profits cannot grow faster than the overall
economy over long periods of time, neither can national wealth. Think of Japan.
At one point in 1989, relatively small areas of Tokyo were worth more than the
total real estate of California. And then the bubble burst and Japanese
national wealth decreased and grew much less than GDP and is now in line with
the long-term nominal growth of GDP.
In the US, long-term growth of nominal GDP is about
5.5 percent. We've actually grown by 7.2 percent for the last 25 years. To
revert to the mean means that over the next 15 years, maybe more, we're going
to see nominal wealth grow between 2.5 and 3 percent. That's a major headwind
and a major dislocation from the experience that we've had. Investors have been
expecting to get the past 25 years to repeat themselves. The laws of economics
suggest that cannot be the case.
We have seen a monster growth in equities in terms
of total market cap, even given the flat growth of the last ten years. We all
know about the housing market.
I have written extensively about
how stock market valuations are mean reverting. We have a long way to go for
valuations in terms of Price to Earnings Ratio to get to the mean, and
typically (as in almost always) we see P/E ratios drop far below the mean. It
is hard to see portfolio increases in such a mean reversion period. We are also
watching housing values come down (see more below). What we are going to see is
a very difficult period for asset growth in precisely the two areas where
investors tend to concentrate their portfolios: US stocks and housing. Using
history as our guide, that period could last for another 5-7 years. That is why
I keep suggesting you look for alternatives to traditional stock market
Housing: Are We at the Bottom?
The short answer is no, but let's look at the
data from one of the most knowledgeable sources on that topic. John Burns of
John Burns Real Estate Consulting consults with over 2000 of the largest banks
and homebuilders in the country (his client list is a who's who of banks,
builders, and hedge funds). He has a reputation for solid research and pulling
no punches. Some of his hedge fund clients were the ones you read about who
made billions. (He wishes he had negotiated a percentage!) He is deeply
involved in analyzing trends in the housing market. His web site is www.realestateconsulting.com.
He has graciously sent me the executive summary of his latest posting (a
27-page executive summary) that we will be looking at for the next few pages.
Let's start with a
quote from John at the beginning of his report: "The
prospects for the U.S. housing market have changed for the worse. It has become
increasingly clear that the U.S. economy is on the brink of recession, as
overall job growth has slowed to zero and retailers are reporting abysmal
results. New home sales, traffic and pricing are all heading down according to
the results of our survey of over 300 builder executives. Resale [existing
home] sales are starting to plateau in some markets, but pricing continues to
fall as distressed sales dominate the market. The new housing bill will help in
some ways, but will first serve a devastating blow to homebuilders, with the
elimination of seller-funded down payment assistance, which accounts for 17% of
new home demand by one estimate."
How far along are we? Burns thinks that home
prices will drop by 22%, 12% of which has already occurred. His analysis
differs from that of the Case-Shiller Indices, which suggests a much steeper
decline. Note in the graph below that the Case-Shiller Index shows home prices
rising more than does Burns' work. Part of it is different methodology and part
of it is that the CS index focuses on major markets and Burns' work is more
However you slice it, there has been a lot of
pain. Shiller's work shows home prices in the areas he measures to be down
about 17%. He said last week that he does not think it unlikely that we sill
see home prices drop by as much as 30%, or about the same as during the Depression
of the '30s. Burns sees less of a drop, but from not as high a point, so they
both end up close to the same end point.
The graph above shows Burns'
projection for the next few years. He thinks it will be 2011 before housing
prices begin to turn back up on a nationwide basis, with national prices
continuing to fall into 2010. That will not sit well with the pundits who keep
telling us each month that we have seen the bottom.
For the difference
in his numbers with Case-Shiller, he offers the following explanation: "The Case-Shiller national number, which is a
"paired sales" analysis, showed much more price appreciation than other indices
based on median prices. We suspect that there was a shift in the mix of homes
sold to lower priced homes in 2006 due to subprime lending, which depressed the
median value and showed large % increases in the paired sales index."
Sales volumes are suffering. "We believe
sales volumes have already fallen back to 1995 levels and will hit 1992 levels
sometime next year, when they will begin to slowly rebound later in the year.
We are already seeing rebounds in some of the hardest hit markets, such as
Southern California, where sales fell to below the levels of the early 1990s.
The rebound in sales will be driven by foreclosure buying activity and demand
from real households that need to move for personal reasons and have been
delaying their purchase for fear of further price corrections. Our 8% per year
projected [starting in 2010] increase doesn't get us back to normal sales
volumes until after 2012, and that is because the tremendous excesses of this
cycle moved many renters into homeownership earlier than usual, and allowed
existing homeowners to 'move up' to their dream home earlier than usual.
Conservative mortgage lending will also prevent a sharp turnaround."
On a more optimistic note, he thinks new home
prices, which started to correct much earlier than existing home prices, should
bottom out in 2009, although some particularly overbuilt areas will suffer longer.
We are actually close to a bottom in new home construction, and he thinks we
will be back to 900,000 new homes by 2012. That is a far cry from the 1.68
million in 2005, but it is also a sustainable number.
is a problem though, and that is the recently enacted housing bill eliminated
seller-funded down payments, and this was 17% of new home sales. Watch for a
rise in the number of new homes sold in September, as the new law does not take
effect until October. Home builders will be telling people to buy now before
this ability to help with the down payment goes away. But cheerleaders on TV
will be telling us the market has turned. They won't be saying that in
Alt-A is the New Subprime
now, everyone in the world is aware of how bad the subprime mortgage business
was. But now it is time to get ready to hear the same tale, told again, about
Alt-A mortgages. These are mortgages made to borrowers with better credit
scores than subprime borrowers, but who could not or decided not to document
their income. One estimate is that 70% of Alt-A borrowers may have exaggerated
their incomes (Wholesale Access). More than half of those were people who
exaggerated their incomes by 50% or more! (Mortgage Asset Research Institute)
much are we talking about? Around 3 million US borrowers have Alt-A
mortgages totaling $1 trillion, compared with $855 billion of subprime loans
outstanding. $400 billion of that was sold in 2006. Almost 16% of securitized
Alt-A loans issued since January 2006 are at least 60 days late. Many of these
loans (around $270 billion) were interest-only or with a low teaser rate, and
the resets were at 3- and 5-year lengths. These are called Option ARMs. That
means starting next year we are going to see a wave of mortgages resetting to
new rates. And it is no modest increase. Rates can jump 4-8% or more from
teaser rates. Some Option ARMs are resetting at 12.25%. That can double a
Washington Mutual were big sellers of Alt-A loans, and had $122 billion and $53
billion, respectively, on their books at the end of the second quarter. Is it
any wonder their stocks are under pressure? That is why it is so hard to
quantify how many more write-offs there will be. You don't write down a
mortgage until it starts to develop problems. These problems may not show up
for a few years. I continue to stress I do not want to own a financial stock
that has exposure to mortgage paper. Write-downs are going to continue to come
for a long time.
This means there
will be a steady wave of foreclosures for the next two years in communities all
over the US. As long as these homes keep coming onto the market, they are going
to exert downward pressure on prices. Foreclosure sales are up by 109 from this
time last year.
Million Unemployed and Counting
The number of people
receiving unemployment benefits jumped to 3.525 million, the highest level
since 2003. My friend, Chief Economist John Silvia at Wachovia forecasts that
unemployment will rise to 6.7% in 2009 (from 5.5% today) and above 7% in 2010.
Given the inability of US consumers to borrow against their homes, and with
rising unemployment, is it any wonder that consumer spending data released this
morning showed retail sales dropping 0.3% in August, for the second month in a
row (July was down 0.5%)? Excluding automobiles, sales dropped 0.7% in August,
the most this year.
Look at this
chart from Greg Weldon (www.weldononline.com).
As he notes, retail sales are posting their worst reading since the last
Prices at the
wholesale level actually fell. Silvia thinks the Consumer Price Index will be
in the neighborhood of 2%. Right now, a lot of people think that sounds crazy;
but I agree. First, remember that CPI measures changes over the last 12 months.
As an example, look at the oil price chart below. Starting next spring, unless
energy prices rise a lot, we are going to see year-over-year comparisons for
energy prices that will be negative. If oil drops to $80, which it very well
could, that would have the affect of decreasing inflation next summer, by a
significant amount. And given that Europe and Japan are in a recession, and
emerging markets have reduced demand because of high prices, thinking that oil
in the short term could be lower is not unreasonable. (Long-term I think oil
will go MUCH higher, but that is another story.) A 40% reduction in gas prices
from their peak is not out of the question. That would impact inflation by
pulling it down.
You can make the
same case for a lot of commodities and some of the food complex as well.
Year-over-year comparisons are going to start to look good in a few quarters.
In absolute terms, looking back a few years, it will still feel like inflation,
but the numbers don't have feelings.
With Europe and
Great Britain central banks likely to cut rates, the dollar is going to get
stronger (as predicted here long ago). That will also help hold inflation down.
Consumer spending is going to continue to be under pressure, which will not be
good for stocks, which means that those facing retirement are going to have to
save more and spend less. I think this time next year we will start to see
stories about deflation. I know, call me crazy, but given that we have seen two
major bubbles burst in the last year (housing and credit), it is not out of the
realm of reason. It is what SHOULD happen. Bursting bubbles are by definition
Within a few
quarters the Fed will not be under pressure to raise rates, especially with
rising unemployment and what is clearly an economy on the ropes. Further, banks
need lower rates in order to re-liquify. Home buyers will need lower rates as
well. I think, as I have written for a long time, that the Fed is on hold for a
very long time. And I am not sanguine that the next move will be a rate hike.
This time next year when inflation is seen as yesterday's problem and
unemployment is rising, the drums may be pounding for a rate cut. We live in
Jolla, South Africa, and London
Next Monday Tiffani
and I get on a plane, assuming the hurricane is out of town by then, and fly to
La Jolla to be with Jon Sundt and the team at my US partner, Altegris
Investments, coming back Tuesday. Then next Friday Chuck Butler from Everbank,
Thomas Fischer from Jyske Bank, and a crew from the Sovereign Wealth Society
are going to show up at my office to watch a Texas Rangers game. Chuck is a
huge baseball fan and he is always fun to be around.
morning I fly to South Africa for a speech the next Tuesday. I will be speaking at the ABSIP (Association for Black
Securities & Investment Professionals) Annual Conference in Cape Town on
September 23. To obtain more information, contact my South African partner,
Prieur du Plessis, through the contact facility on the Investment Postcards from Cape Town
That night I fly to London and spend the day
there with my friend Niels Jensen and his team at my London partners, Absolute
Return Partners. We will be meeting with clients, and I have some time
available there. Contact me and I will put you in touch with them.
There are a lot of things happening in the
alternative investment world, and I try and stay on top of them. If you are
interested in looking at hedge funds, commodity funds, and other alternative funds,
go to www.accreditedinvestor.ws
and sign up, and I will have one of my partners contact you and show you what
is "behind curtain #3". (I am president and a registered representative of
Millennium Wave Securities, LLC., member FINRA.)
My travel and writing schedule is pretty rough
right now. When I get back I have a trip to Europe in mid-October (Sweden,
Malta, London, maybe the Mideast) and then I am coming home for a while to
catch up and finish the book with Tiffani and try to get my own book, way past
due, finished as well.
I am going to hit the send button a little early
so I can make sure everything is ready for Ike to show up tomorrow. We are 250
miles inland (Dallas), but they are expecting some bad weather, and the real
problem here will be that the conditions will be perfect for tornadoes. It
should be an interesting weekend. Right now the weather is perfect, but in 24
hours it will be very wet. The real problems will be in Houston and Galveston.
I wish my fellow Texans well.
I see some time to stay home and read science
fiction in my near future. Enjoy your weekend, wherever you are.
Your hoping it does not get that bad analyst,
Copyright 2008 John Mauldin. All Rights Reserved
If you would like to reproduce any of John Mauldin's E-Letters you must
include the source of your quote and an email address
(John@FrontlineThoughts.com) Please write to info@FrontlineThoughts.com
and inform us of any reproductions. Please include where and when the
copy will be reproduced.
John Mauldin is the President of Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA)
which is an investment advisory firm registered with multiple states.
John Mauldin is a registered representative of Millennium Wave
Securities, LLC, (MWS) an NASD registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a
Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA)
registered with the CFTC, as well as an Introducing Broker (IB).
Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of MWA LLC and MWS LLC. All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot
attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and
readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before
making any investment decisions.
Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. John Mauldin and/or the staffs at Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC
may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Note: The generic Accredited Investor E-letters are
not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of
John Mauldin and Millennium Wave Investments. It is intended solely for
accredited investors who have registered with Millennium Wave
Investments and Altegris Investments at www.accreditedinvestor.ws
or directly related websites and have been so registered for no less
than 30 days. The Accredited Investor E-Letter is provided on a
confidential basis, and subscribers to the Accredited Investor E-Letter
are not to send this letter to anyone other than their professional
investment counselors. Investors should discuss any investment with
their personal investment counsel. John Mauldin is the President of
Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA), which is an investment advisory
firm registered with multiple states. John Mauldin is a registered
representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, (MWS), an FINRA
registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO)
and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) registered with the CFTC, as well
as an Introducing Broker (IB). Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of
MWA LLC and MWS LLC. Millennium Wave Investments cooperates in the
consulting on and marketing of private investment offerings with other
independent firms such as Altegris Investments; Absolute Return
Partners, LLP; Pro-Hedge Funds; EFG Capital International Corp; and
Plexus Asset Management. Funds recommended by Mauldin may pay a portion
of their fees to these independent firms, who will share 1/3 of those
fees with MWS and thus with Mauldin. Any views expressed herein are
provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in
any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest with any
CTA, fund, or program mentioned here or elsewhere. Before seeking any
advisor's services or making an investment in a fund, investors must
read and examine thoroughly the respective disclosure document or
offering memorandum. Since these firms and Mauldin receive fees from
the funds they recommend/market, they only recommend/market products
with which they have been able to negotiate fee arrangements.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF
LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED
FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS,
YOU SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME
PRODUCTS: OFTEN ENGAGE IN LEVERAGING AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT
PRACTICES THAT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS, CAN BE
ILLIQUID, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODIC PRICING OR VALUATION
INFORMATION TO INVESTORS, MAY INVOLVE COMPLEX TAX STRUCTURES AND DELAYS
IN DISTRIBUTING IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN
MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Forex Trading News
Daily Forex Market News
Forex news reports can be found on the forex research
headlines page below. Here you will find real-time forex market news reports
provided by respected contributors of currency trading information. Daily forex
market news, weekly forex research and monthly forex news features can be found
Real-time forex market news reports and features providing
other currency trading information can be accessed by clicking on any of the
headlines below. At the top of the forex blog page you will find the latest
forex trading information. Scroll down the page if you are looking for less
recent currency trading information. Scroll to the bottom of fx blog headlines
and click on the link for past reports on forex. Currency world news reports
from previous years can be found on the left sidebar under "FX Archives."