Saturday September 27, 2008 - 11:08:31 GMT
Share This Story
Thoughts from the Frontline - www.frontlinethoughts.com/learnmore
Forex Blog - Who's Afraid of a Big, Bad Bailout
Who's Afraid of a Big, Bad Bailout?
September 26, 2008Who's Afraid of a Big, Bad Bailout?
It's the End of the World As We Know It
The TED Spread Flashes Trouble
The Transmission Mechanism
Let's Make a Deal
Colorado, California, London, and Sweden
"A tournament, a tournament, a tournament of lies.
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives and I decline.
It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.
(It's time I had some time alone.)"
- Lyrics from R.E.M., 1987
Flying last Tuesday, overnight from Cape Town in South Africa to London, I read in the Financial Times
that Republican Congressman Joe Barton of Texas was quoted as saying
(this is from memory, so it is not exact) that he had difficulty voting
for a bailout plan when none of his constituents could understand the
need to bail out Wall Street, didn't understand the problem, and were
against spending $700 billion of taxpayer money to solve a crisis for a
bunch of (rich) people who took a lot of risk and created the crisis.
That is a sentiment that many of the Republican members of the House
As it happens, I know Joe. My office is in his congressional district.
I sat on the Executive Committee for the Texas Republican Party
representing much of the same district for eight years. This week,
Thoughts from the Frontline will be an open letter to Joe, and through
him to Congress, telling him what the real financial problem is and how
it affects his district, helping explain the problem to his
constituents , and explaining why he has to hold his nose with one hand
and vote for a bailout with the other.
Just for the record, Joe has been in Congress for 24 years. He is the
ranking Republican on the Energy and Commerce Committee, which is one
of the three most important committees and is usually considered in the
top five of Republican House leadership. He is quite conservative and
has been a very good and effective congressman. I have known Joe for a
long time and consider him a friend. He has been my Congressman at
times, depending on where they draw the line. I called his senior aide
and asked him how the phone calls were going. It is at least ten to one
against supporting this bill, and that is probably typical of the
phones all across this country. People are angry, and with real
justification. And watching the debates, it reminds us that one should
never look at how sausages and laws are made. It is a very messy
I think what follows is as good a way as any to explain the crisis we
are facing this weekend. This letter will print out a little longer,
because there are a lot of charts, but the word length is about the
same. Let's jump right in.
It's the End of the World As We Know It
I understand your reluctance to vote for a bill that 90% of the people
who voted for you are against. That is generally not good politics.
They don't understand why taxpayers should spend $700 billion to bail
out rich guys on Wall Street who are now in trouble. And if I only got
my information from local papers and news sources, I would probably
agree. But the media (apart from CNBC) has simply not gotten this story
right. It is not just a crisis on Wall Street. Left unchecked, this will morph within a few weeks to a crisis on Main Street.
What I want to do is describe the nature of the crisis, how this
problem will come home to your district, and what has to be done to
avert a true, full-blown depression, where the ultimate cost will be
far higher to the taxpayers than $700 billion. And let me say that my
mail is not running at 10 to 1 against, but it is really high. I am
probably going to make a lot of my regular readers mad, but they need
to hear what is really happening on the front lines of the financial
First, let's stop calling this a bailout plan. It is not. It is an
economic stabilization plan. Run properly, it might even make the
taxpayers some money. If it is not enacted very soon (Monday would be
fine), the losses to businesses and investors and homeowners all over
the US (and the world) will be enormous. Unemployment will jump to
rates approaching 10%, at a minimum. How did all this come to pass? Why
is it so dire? Let's rewind the tape a bit.
We all know about the subprime crisis. That's part of the problem, as
banks and institutions are now having to write off a lot of bad loans.
The second part of the problem is a little more complex. Because we
were running a huge trade deficit, countries all over the world were
selling us goods and taking our dollars. They in turn invested those
excess dollars in US bonds, helping to drive down interest rates. It
became easy to borrow money at low rates. Banks, and what Paul McCulley
properly called the Shadow Banking System, used that ability to borrow
and dramatically leverage up those bad loans (when everyone thought
they were good), as it seemed like easy money. They created
off-balance-sheet vehicles called Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs)
and put loans and other debt into them. They then borrowed money on the
short-term commercial paper market to fund the SIVs and made as profit
the difference between the low short-term rates of commercial paper and
the higher long-term rates on the loans in the SIV. And if a little
leverage was good, why not use a lot of leverage and make even more
money? Everyone knew these were AAA-rated securities.
And then the music stopped. It became evident that some of these SIVs
contained subprime debt and other risky loans. Investors stopped buying
the commercial paper of these SIVs. Large banks were basically forced
to take the loans and other debt in the SIVs back onto their balance
sheets last summer as the credit crisis started. Because of a new
accounting rule (called FASB 157), banks had to mark their illiquid
investments to the most recent market price of a similar security that
actually had a trade. Over $500 billion has been written off so far,
with credible estimates that there might be another $500 billion to go.
That means these large banks have to get more capital, and it also
means they have less to lend. (More on the nature of these investments
in a few paragraphs.)
Banks can lend to consumers and investors about 12 times their capital
base. If they have to write off 20% of their capital because of losses,
that means they either have to sell more equity or reduce their loan
portfolios. As an example, for every $1,000 of capital, a bank can loan
$12,000 (more or less). If they have to write off 20% ($200), they
either have to sell stock to raise their capital back to $1,000 or
reduce their loan portfolio by $2,400. Add some zeroes to that number
and it gets to be huge.
And that is what is happening. At first, banks were able to raise new
capital. But now, many banks are finding it very difficult to raise
money, and that means they have to reduce their loan portfolios. We'll
come back to this later. But now, let's look at what is happening
today. Basically, the credit markets have stopped functioning. Because
banks and investors and institutions are having to deleverage, that
means they need to sell assets at whatever prices they can get in order
to create capital to keep their loan-to-capital ratios within the
Remember, part of this started when banks and investors and funds used
leverage (borrowed money) to buy more assets. Now, the opposite is
happening. They are having to sell assets into a market that does not
have the ability to borrow money to buy them. And because the
regulators require them to sell whatever they can, the prices for some
of these assets are ridiculously low. Let me offer a few examples.
Today, there are many municipal bonds that were originally sold to
expire 10-15 years from now. But projects finished early and the
issuers wanted to pay them off. However, the bonds often have a minimum
time before they can be called. So, issuers simply buy US Treasuries
and put them into the bond, to be used when the bond can be called.
Now, for all intents and purposes this is a US government bond which
has the added value of being tax-free. I had a friend, John Woolway,
send me some of the bid and ask prices for these type of bonds. One is
paying two times what a normal US Treasury would pay. Another is paying
291% of a normal US Treasury. And it is tax-free! Why would anyone sell
what is essentially a US treasury bond for a discount? Because they are
being forced to sell, and no one is buying! The credit markets are
Last week, I wrote about a formerly AAA-rated residential
mortgage-backed security (RMBS) composed of Alt-A loans, better than
subprime but less than prime. About 5% of the loans were delinquent,
and there are no high-risk option ARMs in the security. It is offered
at 70 cents on the dollar. If you bought that security, you would be
making well over 12% on your money, and 76% of the loans in the
portfolio of that security would have to default and lose over 50% of
their value before you would risk even one penny. Yet the bank which is
being forced to sell that loan has had to write down its value. As I
wrote then, that is pricing in financial Armageddon. (You can read the
full details here.)
Let's look at the following graph. It is an index of AAA-rated mortgage bonds, created by www.markit.com.
It is composed of RMBSs similar to the one I described above.
Institutions buy and sell this index as a way to hedge their
portfolios. It is also a convenient way for an accounting firm to get a
price for a mortgage-backed security in a client bank's portfolio. With
the introduction of the new FASB 157 accounting rule, accountants are
very aggressive about making banks mark their debt down, as they do not
want to be sued if there is a problem. Notice this index shows that
bonds that were initially AAA are now trading at 53 cents on the
dollar, which is up from 42.5 cents two months ago.
Accountants might look at the bond I described above, look at this
index, and decide to tell their clients to mark the bonds down to $.53
on the dollar. The bank is offering the bond at $.70 because it knows
there is quality in the security. They are being forced to sell. And
guess what? There are no buyers. An almost slam-dunk 12% total-return
security with loss-coverage provisions that suggest 40% of the loans
could default and lose 50% before your interest rate yields even
suffered, let alone risk to your principal - and it can't find a buyer.
One of the real reasons these and thousands of other good bonds are not
selling now is that there is real panic in the markets. The oldest
money market fund "broke the buck" last week, because they had exposure
to Lehman Brothers bonds. We are seeing massive flights of capital from
money market funds, including by large institutions concerned about
their capital. What are they buying? Short-term Treasury bills.
Three-month Treasury bills are down to 0.84%.
It gets worse. Last week one-month Treasury bills were paying a
negative 1%!!! That means some buyers were so panicked that they were
willing to buy a bond for $1 that promised to pay them back only $.99
in just one month. The rate is at 0.16% today. If something is not done
this weekend, it could go a lot lower over the next few days. That is
I don't want to name names, as this letter goes to about 1.5 million
people and I don't want to make problems for some fine banking names;
but there is a silent bank run going on. There are no lines in the
street, but it is a run nevertheless. It is large investment funds and
corporations quietly pulling their money from some of the best banks in
the country. They can do this simply by pushing a button. We are
watching deposit bases fall. It does not take long. Lehman saw $400
billion go in just a few months this summer. Think about that number.
Any whiff of a problem and an institution that is otherwise sound could
be brought low in a matter of weeks. And the FDIC could end up with a
large loss that seemed to have come from out of nowhere.
The TED Spread Flashes Trouble
There is something called the TED spread, which is the difference
between three-month LIBOR (the London Inter Bank Offered Rate which is
in euro dollars, also called The Euro Dollar Spread, thus TED) and
three-month US Treasury bills. Three-month LIBOR is basically what
banks charge each other to borrow money. Many mortgages and investments
are based on various periods of LIBOR. Look at the chart below.
Typically the TED spread is 50 basis points (0.50%) or less. When it
spikes up, it is evidence of distress in the financial markets. The
last time the TED spread was as high as it is now was right before the
market crash of 1987. This is a weekly chart, which does not capture
tonight's (Friday) change, which would make it look even worse. Quite
literally, the TED spread is screaming panic.
The Fed has lowered rates to 2%. Typically, three-month LIBOR tracks
pretty close to whatever the Fed funds rate is. Starting with the
credit crisis last year, that began to change. Look at the chart below.
Remember, LIBOR is what banks charge to each other to make loans. Lower
rates are supposed to help banks improve their capital and their
ability to make loans at lower interest rates to businesses and
consumers. Look at what has happened in the past few weeks, in the
chart above. The spread between three-month LIBOR and the Fed funds
rate is almost 200 basis points, or 2%! That is something that defies
imagination to market observers. On the chart above, it looks like it
has not moved that much, but in the trading desks of banks all over the
world it is a heart-pounding, scare-you-to-death move. The chart below
reflects what traders have seen in the past two weeks, and it moved up
Now let's look at the next chart. This is the amount of Tier 1
commercial paper issued. This is the life blood of the business world.
This is how many large and medium-sized businesses finance their
day-to-day operations. The total amount of commercial paper issued is
down about 15% from a year ago, with half of that drop coming in the
last few weeks. Quite literally, the economic body is hemorrhaging.
Unless something is done, businesses all over the US are going to wake
up in a few weeks and find they simply cannot transact business as
usual. This is going to put a real crimp in all sorts of business we
think of as being very far from Wall Street.
I could go on. Credit spreads on high-yield bonds that many of our best
high-growth businesses use to finance their growth are blowing out to
levels which make it impossible for the companies to come to the market
for new funds. And that is even if they could find investors in this
market! There are lots of other examples (solid corporate loans selling
at big discounts, asset-backed securities at discounts, etc.), but you
get the idea. Suffice it to say that the current climate in the
financial market is the worst since the 1930s. But how does a crisis in
the financial markets affect businesses and families in Arlington,
Texas, where my office and half of your district is?
The Transmission Mechanism
The transmission in a car takes energy from the engine and transfers it
to the wheels. Let's talk about how the transmission mechanism of the
Let's start with our friend Dave Moritz down the street. He needs
financing to be able to sell an automobile. To get those loans at good
prices, an auto maker has to be able to borrow money and make the loans
to Dave's customers. But if something does not stop the bleeding, it is
going to get very expensive for GM to get money to make loans. That
will make his cars more expensive to consumers. Cheap loans with small
down payments are the life blood of the auto selling business. That is
going to change dramatically unless something is done to stabilize the
Credit card debt is typically packaged and sold to investors like
pension funds and insurance companies. But in today's environment, that
credit card debt is going to have to pay a much higher price in order
to find a buyer. That means higher interest rates. Further, because
most of the large issuers of credit cards are struggling with their
leverage, they are reducing the amount of credit card debt they will
give their card holders. If they continue to have to write down
mortgages on their books because of mark-to-market rules which price
assets at the last fire-sale price, it will mean even more shrinkage in
Try and sell a home above the loan limits of Fannie and Freddie today
with a nonconforming jumbo loan. Try and find one that does not have
very high rates, because many lenders who normally do them simply
cannot afford to keep them on their balance sheets. And a subprime
mortgage? Forget about it. This is going to get even worse if the
financial markets melt down.
We are in a recession. Unemployment is going to rise to well over 6%.
Consumer spending is going to slow. This is an environment which
normally means it is tougher for small businesses and consumers to get
financing in any event. Congress or the Fed cannot repeal the business
cycle. There are always going to be recessions. And we always get
through them, because we have a dynamic economy that figures out how to
get things moving again.
Recessions are part of the normal business cycle. But it takes a major
policy mistake by Congress or the Fed to create a depression. Allowing
the credit markets to freeze would count as a major policy mistake.
I have been on record for some time that the economy will go through a
normal recession and a slow recovery, what I call a Muddle Through
Economy. This week I met with executives of one of the larger hedge
funds in the world. They challenged me on my Muddle Through stance. And
I had to admit that my Muddle Through scenario is at risk if Congress
does not act to stabilize the credit markets.
Let's Make a Deal
Why do we need this Stabilization Plan? Why can't the regular capital
markets handle it? The reason is that the problem is simply too big for
the market to deal with. It requires massive amounts of patient,
long-term money to solve the problem. And the only source for that
would be the US government.
There is no reason for the taxpayer to lose money. Warren Buffett, Bill
Gross of PIMCO, and my friend Andy Kessler have all said this could be
done without the taxpayer losing money, and perhaps could even make a
profit. As noted above, these bonds could be bought at market prices
that would actually make a long-term buyer a profit. Put someone like
Bill Gross in charge and let him make sure the taxpayers are buying
value. This would re-liquefy the banks and help get their capital
ratios back in line.
Why are banks not lending to each other? Because they don't know what
kind of assets are on each other's books. There is simply no trust. The
Fed has had to step in and loan out hundreds of billions of dollars in
order to keep the financial markets from collapsing. If you allow the
banks to sell their impaired assets at a market-clearing fair price
(not at the original price), then once the landscape is cleared, banks
will decide they can start trusting each other. The commercial paper
market will come back. Credit spreads will come down. Banks will be
able to stabilize their loan portfolios and start lending again.
Again, the US government is the only entity with enough size and
patience to act. We do not have to bail out Wall Street. They will
still take large losses on their securities, just not as large a loss
as they are now facing in a credit market that is frozen. As noted
above, there are many securities that are being marked down and sold
far below a rational price.
If we act now, we will start to see securitization of mortgages, credit
cards, auto loans, and business loans so that the economy can begin to
What happens if we walk away? Within a few weeks at most, financial
markets will freeze even more. We will see electronic runs on major
banks, and the FDIC will have more problems than you can possibly
imagine. The TED spread and LIBOR will get much worse. Businesses which
use the short-term commercial paper markets will start having problems
rolling over their paper, forcing them to make difficult cuts in
spending and employment. Larger businesses will find it more difficult
to get loans and credit. That will have effects on down the economic
food chain. Jim Cramer estimated today that without a plan of some
type, we could see the Dow drop to 8300. That is as good a guess as
any. It could be worse. Home valuations and sales will drop even
The average voter? They will see stock market investments off another
25% at the least. Home prices will go down even more. Consumer spending
will drop. What should be a run-of-the-mill recession becomes a deep
recession or soft depression. Yes, that may be worst-case scenario. But
that is the risk I think we take with inaction.
A properly constructed Stabilization Plan hopefully avoids the
worst-case scenario. It should ultimately not cost the taxpayer much,
and maybe even return a profit. The AIG rescue that Paulson arranged is
an example of how to do it right. My bet is that the taxpayer is going
to make a real profit on this deal. We got 80% of AIG, with what is now
a loan paying the taxpayer over 12%, plus almost $2 billion in upfront
fees for doing the loan. That is not a bailout. That is a business deal
that sounds like it was done by Mack the Knife.
This deal needs to be done by Monday. Every day we wait will see more
and more money fly out the doors of the banks, putting the FDIC at ever
greater risk. Panic will start to set in, moving to ever smaller banks.
Frankly, we are at the point where we need to consider raising the FDIC
limits for all deposits for a period of time, until the Stabilization
Plan quells the panic.
I understand that this is a really, really bad idea according classical
free-market economic theory. You know me; I am as free market as it
comes. But I also know that without immediate action a lot of people
are really going to be hurt. Unemployment is not a good thing. Losses
on your home and investments hurt. It is all nice and well to talk
about theories and contend the market should be allowed to sort itself
out; and if we have a deep recession, then that is what is needed. But
the risk we take is not a deep recession but a soft depression. The
consequences of inaction are simply unthinkable.
Joe, I am telling you that the markets are screaming panic. Yes,
Senator Richard Shelby has his 200 economists saying this is a bad
deal. But they are ivory tower kibitzers who have never sat at a
trading desk. They have never tried to put a loan deal together or had
to worry about commercial paper markets collapsing. I am talking daily
with the people on the desks who are seeing what is really happening.
Shelby's economists are armchair generals far from the front lines. I
am talking to the foot soldiers who are on the front lines.
Every sign of potential disaster is there. You and the rest of the
House have to act. It has to be bipartisan. This should not be about
politics (even though Barney Frank keeps talking bipartisan and then
taking partisan shots, but I guess he just can't help himself). It
should be about doing the right thing for our country and the world. I
know it will not be fun coming back to the district. Talking about TED
spreads and LIBOR will not do much to assuage voters who are angry. But
it is the right thing to do. And I will be glad to come to the town
hall meeting with you and help if you like.
With your help, we will get through this. In a few years, things will
be back to normal and we can all have stories to tell to our grandkids
about how we lived through interesting times. But right now we have to
Colorado, California, London, and Sweden
It is time to hit the send button. This was personally a great week.
For whatever reason, I did not suffer jet lag flying to South Africa
for just two days, then overnight to London, and back the next day. It
was a good trip. I will report more about South Africa in a later
letter, but this e-letter is already a little long.
I leave Sunday for a quick trip to Longmont, Colorado (near Boulder) to
look at a very interesting technology company (InPhase) that makes
holographic memory disks, with good friend Dr. Bart Stuck of Signal
I will be in San Diego and Orange County the 16 and 17 of October for
back-to-back speeches, then I leave Sunday for London for two days and
then on to Sweden for a conference and speeches there, a quick trip to
Malta, and then back home, where I will be chained to my desk by
daughter Tiffani as we do interviews and write a book.
I do enjoy traveling from time to time, seeing the rest of the world. One of my secret pleasures is reading International Living and thinking about what it would be like to have another home somewhere. Cheap thrills. You can subscribe if you like by following this link.
Have a great week. I fully believe (OK, deeply hope) that Congress will act. We can all breathe a collective sigh when they do.
Your still believing in Muddle Through analyst,
Copyright 2008 John Mauldin. All Rights Reserved
If you would like to reproduce any of John Mauldin's E-Letters you must
include the source of your quote and an email address
(John@FrontlineThoughts.com) Please write to info@FrontlineThoughts.com
and inform us of any reproductions. Please include where and when the
copy will be reproduced.
John Mauldin is the President of Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA)
which is an investment advisory firm registered with multiple states.
John Mauldin is a registered representative of Millennium Wave
Securities, LLC, (MWS) an NASD registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a
Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA)
registered with the CFTC, as well as an Introducing Broker (IB).
Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of MWA LLC and MWS LLC. All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot
attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and
readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before
making any investment decisions.
Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. John Mauldin and/or the staffs at Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC
may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Note: The generic Accredited Investor E-letters are
not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of
John Mauldin and Millennium Wave Investments. It is intended solely for
accredited investors who have registered with Millennium Wave
Investments and Altegris Investments at www.accreditedinvestor.ws
or directly related websites and have been so registered for no less
than 30 days. The Accredited Investor E-Letter is provided on a
confidential basis, and subscribers to the Accredited Investor E-Letter
are not to send this letter to anyone other than their professional
investment counselors. Investors should discuss any investment with
their personal investment counsel. John Mauldin is the President of
Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA), which is an investment advisory
firm registered with multiple states. John Mauldin is a registered
representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, (MWS), an FINRA
registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO)
and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) registered with the CFTC, as well
as an Introducing Broker (IB). Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of
MWA LLC and MWS LLC. Millennium Wave Investments cooperates in the
consulting on and marketing of private investment offerings with other
independent firms such as Altegris Investments; Absolute Return
Partners, LLP; Pro-Hedge Funds; EFG Capital International Corp; and
Plexus Asset Management. Funds recommended by Mauldin may pay a portion
of their fees to these independent firms, who will share 1/3 of those
fees with MWS and thus with Mauldin. Any views expressed herein are
provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in
any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest with any
CTA, fund, or program mentioned here or elsewhere. Before seeking any
advisor's services or making an investment in a fund, investors must
read and examine thoroughly the respective disclosure document or
offering memorandum. Since these firms and Mauldin receive fees from
the funds they recommend/market, they only recommend/market products
with which they have been able to negotiate fee arrangements.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF
LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED
FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS,
YOU SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME
PRODUCTS: OFTEN ENGAGE IN LEVERAGING AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT
PRACTICES THAT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS, CAN BE
ILLIQUID, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODIC PRICING OR VALUATION
INFORMATION TO INVESTORS, MAY INVOLVE COMPLEX TAX STRUCTURES AND DELAYS
IN DISTRIBUTING IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN
MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Forex Trading News
Daily Forex Market News
Forex news reports can be found on the forex research
headlines page below. Here you will find real-time forex market news reports
provided by respected contributors of currency trading information. Daily forex
market news, weekly forex research and monthly forex news features can be found
Real-time forex market news reports and features providing
other currency trading information can be accessed by clicking on any of the
headlines below. At the top of the forex blog page you will find the latest
forex trading information. Scroll down the page if you are looking for less
recent currency trading information. Scroll to the bottom of fx blog headlines
and click on the link for past reports on forex. Currency world news reports
from previous years can be found on the left sidebar under "FX Archives."