Share This Story
Forex Blog - Where Do We Go From Here?Where Do We Go From Here?
October 10, 2008
Construction Lending: The Next Shoe to Drop
Lehman at the Center
Iceland Guarantees What?
Letters of Credit: Going, Going Gone?
What to Do and Where Do We Go from Here?
London, Stockholm, and California
I have been writing for almost a year that the next shoe to drop on
US banks would be commercial construction lending. Today we look at
some hard numbers. We look across the pond to sort out the problems in
Europe. We look at the consequences of the losses stemming from Lehman.
Then we look at one of the more serious consequences of the banking
crisis, one that will bring the crisis home to you. Finally, we look at
what the various governments of the world must do in response. It may
not be fun, but it should be interesting. And it is important. Feel
free to forward this letter to anyone who asks why we not only need the
bailout but will need even more coordinated government action.
first, let me offer a note of optimism before I serve up the not so
good news. This is not the end of the world. There are a lot of very
positive things happening in the US and the world. Companies are
creating new inventions. Much of the economy, including health care, is
moving along fine. I have lived through two serious recessions (1973-74
and 1980-82), and the point is that a free-market economy will find a
way to eventually get back to solid growth. Recessions are simply part
of the business cycle. Congress cannot repeal the business cycle. This
will not be the last recession of my life. I hope to live long enough
to go through 4 or 5 more.
Depressions are caused by governments
making major policy mistakes. And we have made some in the areas of not
regulating mortgage lending, allowing the five large investment banks
to increase their leverage to 30 or 40 to one in 2004 (what was the SEC
thinking?), and failing to oversee the rating agencies. That is behind
us. It will make a normal recession deeper and the recovery longer, as
I have been forecasting for some time.
But as I argue below,
immediate actions must be taken by the government to avoid a much
deeper problem. To not take actions to stem the credit crisis would be
that major policy mistake which would compound all the other mistakes.
I think everyone knows the seriousness of the problem and will act.
Let's pray they do.
But whatever happens, there will be plenty of
opportunity for investors and entrepreneurs to exploit. The world is on
the cusp of a remarkable explosion of new technology of all sorts that
will transform our lives. This march of progress went on unchecked last
century, through two world wars, major depressions, numerous smaller
wars, recessions, financial crises all over the world, famines and
natural disasters, not to mention a lot of man-made ones.
current crisis will pass. None of us will want to go back to the "good
old days" in 20 years, for we will be living in the best of times. Just
make sure you keep your powder dry so that you can enjoy it. And now,
let's look at some less than uplifting news.
Construction Lending: The Next Shoe to Drop
Bank Credit Analyst is one of the more reliable sources I know for
information. They estimate that total losses from the current debt
crisis could be anywhere from $1.1 trillion to $1.7 trillion. They
estimate roughly half to be in the banking sector, or around $750
billion, and almost $590 billion of that has already been written off.
That means that the $700 billion from the TARP (government bailout)
program may actually be enough to handle the losses and inject some
actual capital into the banks. Maybe.
The losses from subprime
and other mortgage-related loans are well known. Most of those losses
are in the larger banks, as smaller banks simply could not participate
to any great extent. What is less well understood are the potential
losses which smaller banks are in fact exposed to in the area of
construction lending. Lisa Marquis Jackson, now writing for John Burns
Real Estate Consulting (one of the best sources for hard real estate
data), gives us some answers to the question of "how much?"
of the large home builders and developers, most of the lending for
construction of homes and commercial property comes from regional and
local banks. A local home builder may finance 5-10 homes, or a
developer a small strip mall or apartment complex, from their local
bank. Look at the graph below. Since 2001, delinquencies had been
rather small and well-contained. Then starting 18 months ago, the
delinquency rates started rising.
Again, note that these are delinquency rates for business loans from banks and not for individual mortgages.
16% of loans made for condominium construction are now delinquent.
Loans made for single-family home construction are only slightly more
than 12% overdue. But that masks a much bigger problem. Single-family
loans account for 86% of all for-sale residential construction loans
The good news is that for the top 100 banks by size,
single-family loans make up only 2% of the total. But that small
portion totals $245 billion. And condos add another $41 billion. That
puts almost $40 billion at risk of default at today's delinquency
will be worse for many smaller banks, as they have larger commercial
construction loan portfolios. As noted below, this may require some
proactive action on the part of regulators.
Lehman at the Center
we know the consequences of allowing Lehman to fail. The severity of
the credit crisis was deeply, severely worsened by the failure of
Lehman. Based on the results of the credit auction today, sellers of
protection will need to make cash payments of more than $270 billion,
BNP Paribas SA strategist Andrea Cicione said in London. Some funds may
be forced to dump assets to meet the payment demands if they haven't
How much of that debt will eventually have to be absorbed
by various government programs or direct capital infusions? It is too
soon to say, but you can bet it will be a lot.
If there is any
good news to this, it is that much of the write-downs have already been
made. It now looks like the Lehman CDS market sorted itself out with no
failures, according to the International Swaps and Derivatives
We have dodged a huge bullet. But the anguish this
has put the credit markets through the past month was avoidable. The
CDS markets MUST be made to migrate to a regulated clearing entity like
the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Next week would be a good time. While
there have been serious losses by various players in other
exchange-traded markets, there was no systemic risk, as everyone knew
the value of their various securities, whether futures or options or
other derivatives, and knew they would get their full value when sold.
Lehman, no one really knew until late today. Thus banks and hedge funds
had to sell anything they could in order to meet possible payments or
losses, which caused wildly swinging prices in every market.
is my bet that future memoirs of the various main actors and books on
the credit crisis will look back at the failure of Lehman as the
proverbial "last straw" for the unregulated CDS markets.
Iceland Guarantees What?
get this straight. Iceland is a country of 300,000 people. I've never
met an Icelander I didn't like. They are an extraordinary people. A few
decades ago, they made their money on fishing, farming, and trading.
Then they discovered banking and started to take deposits from anywhere
and everywhere and make loans outside the country. Soon, the various
banks' assets were over $140 billion, about 10 times the total GDP of
the country, and they had far more foreign depositors than citizens.
With foreign reserves of just 2 billion euros, what could the
government do if there was a crisis?
Now Iceland has had to take
over the banks and guarantee deposits. They also had to turn to Russia
for a loan. Does anyone think Putin would hand out a
no-strings-attached loan? Russia needs a refueling station for its Navy
and will likely get it.
Note that Iceland gave its citizens the
ability to withdraw money but did not extend that same privilege to the
citizens of other countries. England and the Netherlands have already
gone to court.
As noted by good friend Dennis Gartman this
morning, "Since then, things have only gotten worse, with the UK
government moving to freeze the assets of Icelandic companies in the
UK, and Her Majesty's government has said that it will take whatever
further actions it deems necessary to protect the assets of British
companies and citizens currently held in Iceland, doing 'whatever is
necessary to recover [our] money.'
"Thus, not only are banks
fearful of lending money to banks; and not only are banks fearful of
lending money to individuals and/or companies; and not only are
individuals and/or companies fearful of lending money to the banks, but
now nations are fearful of lending to other nations. This is
Smoot-Hawley writ large, and of all of the circumstances that have
prevailed in the course of the past several days, this is the worst;
this is the most difficult to deal with. This is madness."
noted last week, Ireland set off a feeding frenzy when it guaranteed
all deposits in its banking institutions. Five billion euros poured in
over the last week. One by one, European governments are having to
guarantee their loans to keep money from leaving their institutions.
look at the Irish guarantee on the face of it. There are six Irish
banks, holding assets of $576 billion. That works out to three times
Ireland's gross domestic product, or about $200,000 for every working
person in the country. (Bedlam Asset Management) Yet depositors flooded
them with money in just a few days.
This is a sign of panic. One goes where one can, trying to protect what one has. On the face of it, how could Ireland really
guarantee all the deposits? Yes, there are real assets against the
loans, but at what price? Could Ireland borrow enough to make good on
even a portion of those assets, should they decide to walk? This is
Letters of Credit: Going, Going Gone?
as the business world is dependent upon commercial paper as its life
blood, the world of global trade depends on letters of credit (LOC).
Without LOCs, the world of trade quickly freezes up.
If you are a
manufacturer of a product and want to sell to someone outside your
borders, you typically require a letter of credit from the buyer before
you load any cargo at a port. A letter of credit from a prime bank is
considered to be proof of your ability to pay. It not only can be a
source of ultimate payment, it can be a source of inventory financing
while goods are in transit.
And if you are a business which is
buying a product, you do not want to release money until you know the
product is on the way. There are buyer's and seller's agents who make
sure these things happen seamlessly, and world commerce had grown
because of it.
Now we are starting to get anecdotal evidence that
this extremely vital market is also freezing up. If you think the
problems stemming from a meltdown with the commercial paper markets are
threatening to the world economy, they are small potatoes when compared
to a seizure in the letter of credit markets.
I had been thinking about this for a few weeks. Then an article posted on Naked Capitalist caught my eye. Quoting:
the end of the day, if every counterparty is bad then you don't have a
market and you don't have an economy. I spoke to another friend of mine
this afternoon, whose father has been in the shipping business forever.
Pristine credit rating, rock solid balance sheet. He says if he takes
his BNP Paribas letter of credit to Citi today for short term funding
for his vessels, they won't give it to him. That means he can't ship
goods, which means that within the next 2 weeks, physical shortages of
commodities begin to show up. THE CENTRAL BANKS CAN'T LET THAT HAPPEN
OR WE HAVE NO ECONOMY, LET ALONE A CREDIT SYSTEM."
And they quote the following story from The Financial Post of Canada:
credit crisis is spilling over into the grain industry as international
buyers find themselves unable to come up with payment, forcing sellers
to shoulder often substantial losses.
"Before cargoes can be
loaded at port, buyers typically must produce proof they are good for
the money. But more deals are falling through as sellers decide they
don't trust the financial institution named in the buyer's letter of
credit, analysts said.
"'There are all kinds of stuff stacked up
on docks right now that can't be shipped because people can't get
letters of credit,' said Bill Gary, president of Commodity Information
Systems in Oklahoma City. 'The problem is not demand, and it's not
supply because we have plenty of supply. It's finding anyone who can
come up with the credit to buy.'
"So far the problem is mostly
being felt in U.S. and South American ports, but observers say it is
only a matter of time before it hits Canada. 'We've got a nightmare in
front of us and a lot of people are concerned it's going to get a lot
worse,' said Anthony Temple, a grain marketing expert based in
"Access to credit is key to the survival of maritime
trade and insiders now say the supply is being severely restricted.
More than 90% of the world's trade by volume goes by ship. 'The credit
crisis has made banks nervous and the last thing on their minds is
making fresh loans,' Omar Nokta, an analyst at investment bank Dahlman
Rose, said in an interview with Reuters.
"While shipping has
always been a cyclical industry whose fortunes rise and fall with the
global economy, analysts said the current crisis over the drying up of
credit is something they have never seen before."
If banks are
refusing to go into the LIBOR market and lend to each other, then why
would they want to take a letter of credit either? At first, it will be
a small trickle, which is how the commercial paper meltdown started.
Then it will be a flood.
The one good sector in the US is its
export sector. Start slowing that down due to a lack of ability to ship
or receive payments and see what happens to an already shrinking
economy. If anyone wants to see how the credit crisis can affect Main
Street, look no further.
It is hard to overstate the problem and
the potential for it to create a true economic meltdown. It must be
dealt with, and soon. See more below.
What to Do and Where Do We Go from Here?
credit markets are frozen. Period. The chart below shows one week LIBOR
going back for four years. Notice the gradual rise into 2005? It was a
lock-step move with the Fed funds rate. And the less smooth drop was
also in concert with the Fed funds rate. The recent spike is not
responding to this week's Fed funds cut. The spreads are wider than
ever. The problem is not just the price of LIBOR. There is no trading
at any price. The LIBOR market is a fiction today. And left unchecked,
this lack of dealing with other banks will spread to letters of credit
and the international trade markets.
G-7 group of nations is holding an emergency meeting this weekend. As I
write this, reports are coming in that there are serious disagreements
as to what to do. They cannot even agree on a press release.
Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker urged that "all of them [the G-7
nations] now admit or all of them own up to the fact their own banks
are going to need support," in an interview on PBS Television's Charlie Rose Show yesterday.
real leadership and innovation in the banking crisis seems to be coming
from London. UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling told
Bloomberg Television that "It is absolutely essential that the world's
largest economies act together, and act together now." Darling wants
countries to guarantee lending between banks, either by turning central
banks into clearing houses for the loans or having governments back
Sadly, he is right. It has come to that. We are
close to the point of no return. Now, we are not talking about bailing
out financial institutions. We are literally talking about saving the
world economic system. Failed bank lending and a large decrease in
letters of credit would guarantee a deep world recession. The last
depression produced severe political backlash and a world war.
it is simply not worth the risk to say that we should sit back and let
the markets work. They are not working, and there are no signs they
will. As with a patient whose heart has stopped, it is time to apply
the shock treatment.
What should we do? We must simply
guarantee LIBOR (interbank) lending worldwide for some period of time
(say 3-6 months) or until banks can trust each other's balance sheets.
With the Lehman crisis going on, with more mortgage credit problems
being revealed, no one knows what their own exposure is, let alone what
the exposures of other banks are. Until that dust settles, the LIBOR
market will remain frozen. The longer this is allowed to continue, the
worse the problems will be. And it needs to be handled on a coordinated
Banking is truly global. The system cannot just be
guaranteed by England or the US. It must be done in concert with all
major nations contributing their share. Businesses must be able to
trade across borders through banks that will accept one another's
letters of credit.
Second, we must consider direct investment
in some banks. This should be done as preferred shares, with the view
to eventually selling the paper back into the market. To make sure that
money is not invested poorly or on bad terms, the various governments
should invest alongside private investors, on the same terms. If a bank
cannot find private investors willing to invest alongside the
government, then they should be quietly assisted into the arms of
stronger banks. Banks that are too big to fail must be taken over.
must have access to credit as well. They cannot get it from banks with
impaired balance sheets. This is critical to world trade as well as
Third, for a short period of time, all bank
deposits in the US must be guaranteed. Weak banks must be absorbed into
stronger banks as soon as possible. There are banks with large
construction loan books in the hardest-hit parts of the US housing
crisis, and they need to be put down as quickly as possible. We are
already seeing deposits leave banks, many of them small, due to
depositor concerns that small banks will not be seen as too big to
fail. This must stop. A blanket guarantee will help.
mark-to-market rules must be reconsidered. A blanket one-size-fits-all
rule clearly does not work and is part of the problem. As I have
documented for the last month, there are numerous assets that have a
market price far below their intrinsic value. That is because there are
simply no buyers. If everyone is selling in order to raise capital,
then that will drive down prices to bargain levels below intrinsic
value. That does not mean the asset in question would not have a higher
value in a market not in crisis.
These are extraordinary times. I
know there will be those who believe the markets should be allowed to
work or simply want those who created the crisis to pay. I do
understand the anger. I too am angry, and have been for a long time.
Those of us who saw this crisis coming are frustrated that no one
bothered to pay attention.
But now that we are in it the midst of
the crisis, there is no going back. We must look forward and do what we
can to avoid an even worse crisis and potential depression. I believe
we can do so if governments act promptly.
We are already in
what will prove to be one of the longer recessions on record. If we
look at the Leading Economic Indicators, which have about a 9-month
forward-looking view, it will be late next year before we start to grow
once again. Given that everything peaked last October through January
(sales, employment, etc.), it is likely that the recession will be
dated from the beginning of this year.
Long-time readers know I
have been wary of the stock market for several years, suggesting that
investors either avoid stocks or have close stop losses. No one taking
my advice is long-only this market. Not that I have been perfect, but
as it turns out, I was right on this one.
I have been fielding
calls all week asking me if I think we are close to a bottom in the
stock market. And my answer is, we are close to a short-term bottom,
but I think we will trade lower over time due to what I think are going
to be poor earnings for the next few quarters. If you are a trader (and
that means you have been doing it for some time - not the time to get
on the job training!), then maybe you can catch a rebound, which is
overdue. But (and here is the big caveat) if there is no global
coordination on some or all of the recommendations I made above, this
is not going to be pretty. It will end in tears. Let's hope the
authorities can get their collective act together.
The next two
weeks I'll send a two-part letter on the longer-term investment view
and how you should position your portfolios. Stay tuned.
London, Stockholm, and California
Thursday and Friday I am in Southern California, speaking at two
financial planning conferences. Saturday I leave for London to meet
with my London partners, Absolute Return Partners, and clients. Then on
to Stockholm, where I will speak for the now-Swedish-government-backed
bank Kaupthing. The government took the bank over last Monday (it was
affiliated with the Icelandic bank of the same name). That conference
will be on investing in an age of scarcity. I will be speaking and
chairing the panels, and good friend Marc Faber will be there as well.
It will be an interesting time to be in London and Europe. A quick trip
to Malta, and then I will make my way back to Dallas.
night all seven of my kids and family will gather to celebrate my son
Chad's birthday and mine as well (it was last week). It will be nice to
have them all under the roof, if only for a day or two. And a pleasant
reminder of what is really important.
It is time to hit the send
button. My friend Jack Harrod has front-row seats on the glass for the
Dallas Stars. I don't understand hockey, but it is exciting sitting
that close. All the best, and have a great week - and here's hoping for
a bounce in the markets.
Your hoping we see some positive news this weekend analyst,
Copyright 2008 John Mauldin. All Rights Reserved
If you would like to reproduce any of John Mauldin's E-Letters you must
include the source of your quote and an email address
([email protected]) Please write to [email protected]
and inform us of any reproductions. Please include where and when the
copy will be reproduced.
John Mauldin is the President of Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA)
which is an investment advisory firm registered with multiple states.
John Mauldin is a registered representative of Millennium Wave
Securities, LLC, (MWS) an NASD registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a
Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA)
registered with the CFTC, as well as an Introducing Broker (IB).
Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of MWA LLC and MWS LLC. All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot
attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and
readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before
making any investment decisions.
Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. John Mauldin and/or the staffs at Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC
may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Note: The generic Accredited Investor E-letters are
not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of
John Mauldin and Millennium Wave Investments. It is intended solely for
accredited investors who have registered with Millennium Wave
Investments and Altegris Investments at www.accreditedinvestor.ws
or directly related websites and have been so registered for no less
than 30 days. The Accredited Investor E-Letter is provided on a
confidential basis, and subscribers to the Accredited Investor E-Letter
are not to send this letter to anyone other than their professional
investment counselors. Investors should discuss any investment with
their personal investment counsel. John Mauldin is the President of
Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA), which is an investment advisory
firm registered with multiple states. John Mauldin is a registered
representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, (MWS), an FINRA
registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO)
and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) registered with the CFTC, as well
as an Introducing Broker (IB). Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of
MWA LLC and MWS LLC. Millennium Wave Investments cooperates in the
consulting on and marketing of private investment offerings with other
independent firms such as Altegris Investments; Absolute Return
Partners, LLP; Pro-Hedge Funds; EFG Capital International Corp; and
Plexus Asset Management. Funds recommended by Mauldin may pay a portion
of their fees to these independent firms, who will share 1/3 of those
fees with MWS and thus with Mauldin. Any views expressed herein are
provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in
any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest with any
CTA, fund, or program mentioned here or elsewhere. Before seeking any
advisor's services or making an investment in a fund, investors must
read and examine thoroughly the respective disclosure document or
offering memorandum. Since these firms and Mauldin receive fees from
the funds they recommend/market, they only recommend/market products
with which they have been able to negotiate fee arrangements.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF
LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED
FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS,
YOU SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME
PRODUCTS: OFTEN ENGAGE IN LEVERAGING AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT
PRACTICES THAT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS, CAN BE
ILLIQUID, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODIC PRICING OR VALUATION
INFORMATION TO INVESTORS, MAY INVOLVE COMPLEX TAX STRUCTURES AND DELAYS
IN DISTRIBUTING IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN
MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Forex Trading News
Daily Forex Market News
Forex news reports can be found on the forex research
headlines page below. Here you will find real-time forex market news reports
provided by respected contributors of currency trading information. Daily forex
market news, weekly forex research and monthly forex news features can be found
Real-time forex market news reports and features providing
other currency trading information can be accessed by clicking on any of the
headlines below. At the top of the forex blog page you will find the latest
forex trading information. Scroll down the page if you are looking for less
recent currency trading information. Scroll to the bottom of fx blog headlines
and click on the link for past reports on forex. Currency world news reports
from previous years can be found on the left sidebar under "FX Archives."