|Orlando, Colorado Springs, New York, and Las Vegas|
World Trade Is Falling Off a Cliff
start with some charts from my friend Simon Hunt, out of London. The following
chart shows World Merchandise Export Values and World Industrial Production
falling off a cliff. This is the worst such period since the end of World War II.
And as the data we will examine next indicates, it is likely to get worse.
Simon notes that consumer spending is about 60% of world GDP, and it is not
just in the US that spending is slowing down. Consumers all over the developed
world are in shock, as assets such as stocks and houses, real estate, and
commodities fall in value. Unemployment is rising.
think that almost 2,000,000 lost jobs in the last three months in the US is a
catastrophe. China lost a reported 20,000,000 jobs in the last quarter, and migrant
workers came back to the cities after Chinese New Year to find factories and
jobs simply gone. Unemployment is rising rapidly in Europe, as the demand for
goods has clearly been falling since last October.
means that inventories are too high, not just in the US but in factories all
over the world, and that production is slowing down. Look at the recent US
trade deficit. Many market analysts rejoiced that it dropped to a six-year low,
just below $40 billion. But the internal numbers were not as positive. Exports
are dropping faster than imports, as seen below. "After growing in every
quarter during the last three years, real goods exports fell 34.9% at an annual
rate, the worst performance in more than three decades." (www.dismal.com) And a falling deficit means
that US consumers have to save more to balance out less foreign buying of US
debt. There is no free lunch.
look at a little bit of insider economics trivia. The US government first
estimated that GDP last quarter was a negative 3.8%. I wrote when that number
first came out that it would be revised downward.
When the government makes its initial
forecast of GDP one month following the end of a quarter, it has to estimate what
exports and imports were for the last month of the quarter. There is simply no
data. For the 4th quarter of 2008, they estimated that the trade deficit
would be about $34.5 billion, in line with what most economists thought. As it
turns out, each $1 billion represents about 0.1% of GDP. So being off about $5
billion from the actual total of $40 billion subtracts another 0.5% of GDP from
the previous estimate of -3.8%, taking it to a -4.3%.
Further, the government makes
estimates about inventories which also affect GDP. When final numbers on real
inventories come in, it will also add to the negative GDP estimate. Expect GDP
to be in the range of a negative 5% for the 4th quarter, and the
current quarter is likely to be almost as weak.
In the US, the leading economic
indicators (LEI) continued to decline, but the leading indicators in the rest
of the world were often much worse. (The chart below is again from Simon Hunt.)
These are results from the OECD's analysis of the leading economic indicators
for a variety of countries. Notice in particular how poorly Russia and China
are doing! Also remember that the LEI is about how the economy is expected to
be doing in six months, not what is going on right now. This argues that there
is no real global turnaround in the picture before the end of the third
quarter, at the earliest.
has seen its year-over-year exports drop by 17.5% and imports by 43%. These are
not signs of a healthy economy. That being said, China is massively increasing
bank loans and other stimulus-type spending to try and offset the effects of
the global downturn. But putting 20 million people back to work in a short time
is a daunting task.
Japanese GDP was down by 9% (!)
last quarter. Many of the largest corporations are seeing exports drop by
20-30% and are engaged in massive layoffs, larger proportionally than in the
US. The euro area economy dropped by 6% in the 4th quarter, led by
an 8.2% contraction in Germany (JP Morgan). I could go on and on, but the news
is the same. The global economy is in a deep and worsening recession.
European Bank Losses Dwarf Those in the US
a few paragraphs I am going to put up a chart from Nouriel Roubini's RGE Monitor on the size of US bank losses,
and in a few pages I'll comment on the Geithner "plan" for rescuing US banks.
We have indeed dug ourselves a very deep hole here in the US.
But European banks may be in far
worse shape. Bruno Waterfield of the London
Daily Telegraph reports to have seen an eyes-only document prepared by the
European Commission for the finance ministers of the various EU member
countries. The problem revealed in the report is an estimated write-down by European
banks in the range of 16 trillion pounds, or about $25 trillion dollars! The
concern is that bailing out the various national banks for such an unbelievable
amount would push the cost of government borrowing to much higher levels than we
As my kids would say, "Really, Dad,
you think so?" Europe is somewhat larger than the US, so think what my gold-bug
friends would say if the US decided to borrow $25 trillion to bail out US banks.
The dollar would be crucified! The euro is going to get a lot weaker if bank
problems are even half of what the report says they are. The British pound
sterling is already off almost 30% and, depending on what the real damage is to
their banking system, it could get worse.
Waterfield reports, "National
leaders and EU officials share fears that a second bank bail-out in Europe will
raise government borrowing at a time when investors -- particularly those who lend money to European governments -- have
growing doubts over the ability of countries such as Spain, Greece, Portugal,
Ireland, Italy and Britain to pay it back.
"The Commission figure is
significant because of the role EU officials will play in devising rules to
evaluate 'toxic' bank assets later this month. New moves to bail out banks will
be discussed at an emergency EU summit at the end of February. The EU is deeply
worried at widening spreads on bonds sold by different European countries."
Part of the problem is that European banks were far more highly leveraged than
US banks. Some banks were reportedly leveraged 50:1. And they lent money to
Eastern European projects and businesses which are now facing severe financial
strain and plummeting local currencies.
Let that number rattle around in
your head for a moment: $25 trillion. Even $5 trillion would be daunting. But
the problem is that Europe does not have a central bank that can step in and
selectively save banks from one country without taking on all euro zone member-country
banks. Yet, as noted above, some countries may not have the wherewithal to save
their own banks. It is reported that some Austrian banks are hoping that
Germany will step in and help them. Given Germany's problems, they may have a
Now, let's look at what Nouriel
Roubini (www.RGEmonitor.com and
professor at NYU) estimates for US banks losses. He puts the figure at some
$1.7-1.8 trillion out of a total of about $3 trillion (I think) in total
financial system losses. And Nouriel's base assumptions are not all that
bearish, given what we know: a 5% GDP contraction and 9% unemployment, with
housing prices down another 20%. All those estimates are quite plausible.
And a quick promotional plug: my
next recorded "Conversation" will be with Nouriel and his staff in a few weeks.
See the link at the end of the letter to make sure you get your copy.
Geithner: "You Can't Handle the Truth"
The critics were quick to pan
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's bank bailout plan as being weak on details.
Which was true. There wasn't much substance in his speech. But let me offer a
contrarian view. Geithner and the team around him may not be entirely tone
deaf. They are very smart people and are surely in contact with major Wall
Street figures, and would know that the lack of detail would disappoint.
Pretty much everyone knows the
scene from A Few Good Men, where Jack
Nicholson tells Tom Cruise, "You can't handle the truth!" (www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hGvQtumNAY)
What if the number that the Treasury and the Fed
are looking at is a lot more than the remaining $350 billion in the TARP
program? As in another $1 trillion more, or even the $1.5 trillion that Roubini
says may be out there (and other independent analysts, like David Rosenberg of
Merrill, say there may be another $2 trillion in losses). Can you imagine what
the market reaction would have been if they had announced that this week? The
Dow down 400 points would have seemed like a Sunday walk in the park. Congress
would be screaming, and the chances for the stimulus package to pass would have
I don't think we know the real extent of what it is
going to cost to shore up the banking system. But the consensus among the
financial leadership is that we have to fix the credit system no matter what
the costs, or risk a repeat of the Great Depression. That is the essence of
what Irving Fisher taught us some 75 years ago, when faced with a deflationary
Time for a
Reality check: The "stimulus" that President Obama
will sign Monday is a band-aid. If Irving Fisher, who by some accounts was our
finest American economist, was right, such a stimulus is useful in that it
helps those who are unemployed and replaces some lost consumer spending; but
the real work that must be done is to get the credit system flowing again. I
don't have the space to go into that economic debate tonight, but it is at the
core of the problem. It is Keynes vs. Fisher, von Mises vs. Friedman. It is, as
Lacy Hunt says, "The Grand Experiment." After 70 years, we are going to see who
is right. My money is on Fisher. It is not an experiment that is going to be
fun to live through; but when we have the next debt deflation in 70 years or so,
our grandchildren may know what to do.
We will see another stimulus package, probably by
the end of the year. This time it will hopefully provide real stimulus. Much of
the current version is simply an increase in federal spending that will be hard
to rein in. And please, I am not being partisan. That is the analysis of many
of Obama's advisors. And it goes back to the debate I mentioned. Keynes would
argue that it is in fact stimulus. The other three economists would have differing
views. And like I said, in a few years we are going to know who was right.
But the heavy lifting is going to be done by the
Fed. Watch their balance sheet expand. And watch Treasury and the FDIC come
back and ask for massive amounts of money to take over very large insolvent
banks. Stay tuned.
Get Even Worse
Last week I said that 2009 as-reported earnings
estimates for the S&P 500 would be dropping. 2008 earnings had dropped to
$29.57 as I wrote the letter. They are now down to $28.60. One of my favorite
analysts is David Rosenberg of Merrill Lynch. His
forecast for reported earnings for 2009 is now down to $28. That puts the P/E
for the S&P 500 at 30.
He also projects "operating" earnings to be $55 for
2010. And, as he writes today:
looking for a silver lining, at least we are going to have a deeper bottom to
bounce off. Applying a classic recession-trough multiple of 12x against a
forward EPS estimate of $55 would imply an ultimate low of 666 on the S&P
500, likely by October if our estimate of the timing for the end of the
official downturn is accurate."
That is a 20%
drop from today's close of 829. That is not what you will hear from "sell-side"
managers who want you to invest in their mutual funds and long-only management
I noted the
problem with the rest of the world earlier. 40% of the earnings for the S&P
500 are from outside the US. It is hard to see how those earnings are not going
to be deeply affected. Let me reiterate my continued warning: this is not a market
you want to buy and hold from today's level. This is just far too precarious an
economic and earnings environment.
probable ongoing bad news from financial and consumer stocks, plus the
depressing news on bank losses coming down the road, why take the risk?
Orlando, Colorado Springs, New York, and Las
Monday I fly out to Colorado Springs to look at a very intriguing high-tech
start-up. As gloomy as this letter was, there are so many cool opportunities to
get involved with new companies with truly world-changing technologies. Maybe
it is just serendipitous, but I am seeing more exciting possibilities than I
On Friday I am
off to Florida for a conference sponsored by Cain, Watters
& Associates, and then back home for a few weeks (maybe) before I head
to New York in mid-March and then to Las Vegas to be with Doug Casey and
friends at his "Crisis & Opportunity Summit," March 20-22. Doug and his
associate David Galland have really put together a great line-up. If you are
interested in gold and natural resources, this may be a conference you want to
attend. I always enjoy being with Doug and David, as they are old friends. And
it is interesting to be at a conference where I am the "bull." Click to learn more about the Summit.
I mentioned the edition of "Conversations with
John Mauldin" I will be doing with Nouriel Roubini. And the one I did with
Lacy Hunt and Ed Easterling, where we talked about the economics "Great Experiment,"
is up! We recorded it two weeks ago, and I thought it went very well for an
inaugural talk. The complete audio and transcript are already in the Membership
Library. We are getting very favorable reviews. Multiple readers have let us
know that the first Conversation was worth their entire year's membership. I am
quite pleased with the first transcript and the response to it. After the
release of banking data in early March, I will do a Conversation with good
buddy Chris Whalen and a few real banking experts, on where the US banking
system really is. I will offer it as a bonus to those who have already
subscribed, as it will be more me asking questions than a real Conversation. I
expect it to be very informative.
The regular price for a yearly subscription is
$199, but you can subscribe now for $109 and still get access to the timely
Conversation with Ed and Lacy. Don't wait, as I am sure my staff will only keep
raising the price. To find out more, just click on the link and put in code
JM75, which will give you the discounted price. https://www.johnmauldin.com/newsletters2.html
organizations that would like to purchase a discounted multiple subscription
for all their brokers or partners, just drop Tiffani a note at [email protected] and she
will get back to you.
It is late and time to hit the send button. Have a
great week, and enjoy the holiday weekend in the US!
Your on the lookout for more opportunities analyst,
Copyright 2009 John Mauldin. All Rights Reserved
If you would like to reproduce any of John Mauldin's E-Letters you must
include the source of your quote and an email address
([email protected]) Please write to [email protected]
and inform us of any reproductions. Please include where and when the
copy will be reproduced.
John Mauldin is the President of Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA)
which is an investment advisory firm registered with multiple states.
John Mauldin is a registered representative of Millennium Wave
Securities, LLC, (MWS) an NASD registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a
Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA)
registered with the CFTC, as well as an Introducing Broker (IB).
Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of MWA LLC and MWS LLC. All
material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot
attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and
readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before
making any investment decisions.
Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior
notice. John Mauldin and/or the staffs at Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC
may or may not have investments in any funds cited above.
Note: The generic Accredited Investor E-letters are
not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of
John Mauldin and Millennium Wave Investments. It is intended solely for
accredited investors who have registered with Millennium Wave
Investments and Altegris Investments at www.accreditedinvestor.ws
or directly related websites and have been so registered for no less
than 30 days. The Accredited Investor E-Letter is provided on a
confidential basis, and subscribers to the Accredited Investor E-Letter
are not to send this letter to anyone other than their professional
investment counselors. Investors should discuss any investment with
their personal investment counsel. John Mauldin is the President of
Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA), which is an investment advisory
firm registered with multiple states. John Mauldin is a registered
representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, (MWS), an FINRA
registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO)
and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) registered with the CFTC, as well
as an Introducing Broker (IB). Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of
MWA LLC and MWS LLC. Millennium Wave Investments cooperates in the
consulting on and marketing of private investment offerings with other
independent firms such as Altegris Investments; Absolute Return
Partners, LLP; Pro-Hedge Funds; EFG Capital International Corp; and
Plexus Asset Management. Funds recommended by Mauldin may pay a portion
of their fees to these independent firms, who will share 1/3 of those
fees with MWS and thus with Mauldin. Any views expressed herein are
provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in
any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest with any
CTA, fund, or program mentioned here or elsewhere. Before seeking any
advisor's services or making an investment in a fund, investors must
read and examine thoroughly the respective disclosure document or
offering memorandum. Since these firms and Mauldin receive fees from
the funds they recommend/market, they only recommend/market products
with which they have been able to negotiate fee arrangements.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF
LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED
FUNDS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS,
YOU SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME
PRODUCTS: OFTEN ENGAGE IN LEVERAGING AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT
PRACTICES THAT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS, CAN BE
ILLIQUID, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODIC PRICING OR VALUATION
INFORMATION TO INVESTORS, MAY INVOLVE COMPLEX TAX STRUCTURES AND DELAYS
IN DISTRIBUTING IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN
MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN
ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.