User Name: Password:      Register - Lost password?

 


 


Forex Blog

Forex Trading News

Forex Research

Back to The Headlines
Friday March 12, 2010 - 20:33:44 GMT
Foreign Exchange Analytics - www.fxa.com

Share This Story:
| | Email

Banking Crisis Amnesia, Regulator Preservation

Let me start by saying I make a living largely from the banking system, and certainly entirely from the financial system.  So I am aware of the adage don’t bite the hand that feeds you.  Well considering my ability to influence mainstream thought on key financial questions, I am afraid to admit that any bite on the banking system’s hand from me is more akin to being gummed by a toothless octogenarian. 

 

Reading the reports of the Lehman Repo 105’s in the press today sparked my own sense of outrage.  How could something so blatantly misleading and deliberately misleading ever be allowed to have happened in 2008 after Bear Stearns was gone and after regulators actually went into Lehman in Q2 to conduct reviews of the balance sheet for potential problems?  Ernst and Young signed off on this creative accounting, internal controls signed off on it, Dick Fuld presumably signed off on it and counterparties took the other side of the repo presumably knowing the intent (otherwise why was their a haircut…of was it the cost for silence?). 

 

Why no one at this institution, which probably even more than Bear (by lots) was responsible for near death of capitalism, is not behind bars some 2 years after the fact is mindboggling.  Is there a statute of limitations in play?  Are regulators so worried about any prosecution revealing embarrassing regulatory failings that they have more or less killed any effort to bring charges against the perpetrators?  I don’t get it.

 

And Congress which is supposed to legislate so that this crisis never happens again is allegedly being shown all new regulatory measures from the lobbyists of the banks as well as banks directly.  I would like to see the phone logs and office logs of Senator Dodd, Senator Corker and Senator Shelby.  Clearly the banks are of the view that what happened in 2008 was a perfect storm and won’t happen again which means minimal regulatory reform in the banking system is needed and surely that does not include an independent consumer financial regulatory agency.   Big banks, leveraged balance sheets, broadly defined capital requirements, ongoing opaque OTC derivatives market and near zero cost of funds (most don’t see ZIRP changing until 2011) are all considered sacrosanct.  In other words the way of doing things pre-Lehman were fine then and fine now…but not fine for a very brief period in 2008. 

 

Banks are also fighting tooth and nail to keep the OTC market in derivatives from being forced onto exchanges (even basic products like FX swaps).  While there is some argument for throwing the baby out with the bath water if this reform happens, I hardly think moving derivatives to exchanges (much of this business is already there) is a game changer –yes one can see unintended consequences as some owners of derivatives may have a legal out from their contracts and we could see another rush to call in collateral.   How insignificant would it be if the one “big”change in banking is a much reduced OTC derivatives market?  And with the run on Greek debt and subsequent rise in sovereign Greek CDS, the momentum to regulate CDS and other derivatives away has mushroomed. 

 

But what about banks being 30-40% of all corporate profits (US) as was happening in 2007?  As best I can tell officials and regulators think this is a sustainable model.  If they did not then there would be a far more serious effort to break up large banks and turn them into boring, highly regulated utilities that actually exist to perform their time honored function – creation of credit – rather than highly leveraged, high risk businesses that have to generate massive revenues based on massively high costs (compensation).  A Tobin tax on transactions to pay for future failure (large unwinds) seems a small price to keep the industry pretty much intact despite a near death experience in 2008. 

 

I liked the way the world looked before 2007…I benefited personally no doubt.  But I for one can’t believe that anything short of a massive reinvention of banking to Glass-Steagall world is going to yield any different outcome than the one we just went through. How can any reasonable person ever feel confident in the banking system again if it’s key components remain in place. 

 

And those pushing for real overhaul like Volcker, face serious pushback from the very pro-Wall Street likes of Geithner and Summers.  If anything the current approach of regulators and US government to reforming the banking system reminds me of how Toyota is dealing with its unintended acceleration problem…now that I think if it the very name has an eerie application to 2008.

 

David Gilmore

Well considering my ability to influence mainstream thought on key financial questions, I am afraid to admit that any bite on the banking system’s hand from me is more akin to being gummed by a toothless octogenarian. 

 

Reading the reports of the Lehman Repo 105’s in the press today sparked my own sense of outrage.  How could something so blatantly misleading and deliberately misleading ever be allowed to have happened in 2008 after Bear Stearns was gone and after regulators actually went into Lehman in Q2 to conduct reviews of the balance sheet for potential problems?  Ernst and Young signed off on this creative accounting, internal controls signed off on it, Dick Fuld presumably signed off on it and counterparties took the other side of the repo presumably knowing the intent (otherwise why was their a haircut…of was it the cost for silence?). 

 

Why no one at this institution, which probably even more than Bear (by lots) was responsible for near death of capitalism, is not behind bars some 2 years after the fact is mindboggling.  Is there a statute of limitations in play?  Are regulators so worried about any prosecution revealing embarrassing regulatory failings that they have more or less killed any effort to bring charges against the perpetrators?  I don’t get it.

 

And Congress which is supposed to legislate so that this crisis never happens again is allegedly being shown all new regulatory measures from the lobbyists of the banks as well as banks directly.  I would like to see the phone logs and office logs of Senator Dodd, Senator Corker and Senator Shelby.  Clearly the banks are of the view that what happened in 2008 was a perfect storm and won’t happen again which means minimal regulatory reform in the banking system is needed and surely that does not include an independent consumer financial regulatory agency.   Big banks, leveraged balance sheets, broadly defined capital requirements, ongoing opaque OTC derivatives market and near zero cost of funds (most don’t see ZIRP changing until 2011) are all considered sacrosanct.  In other words the way of doing things pre-Lehman were fine then and fine now…but not fine for a very brief period in 2008. 

 

Banks are also fighting tooth and nail to keep the OTC market in derivatives from being forced onto exchanges (even basic products like FX swaps).  While there is some argument for throwing the baby out with the bath water if this reform happens, I hardly think moving derivatives to exchanges (much of this business is already there) is a game changer –yes one can see unintended consequences as some owners of derivatives may have a legal out from their contracts and we could see another rush to call in collateral.   How insignificant would it be if the one “big”change in banking is a much reduced OTC derivatives market?  And with the run on Greek debt and subsequent rise in sovereign Greek CDS, the momentum to regulate CDS and other derivatives away has mushroomed. 

 

But what about banks being 30-40% of all corporate profits (US) as was happening in 2007?  As best I can tell officials and regulators think this is a sustainable model.  If they did not then there would be a far more serious effort to break up large banks and turn them into boring, highly regulated utilities that actually exist to perform their time honored function – creation of credit – rather than highly leveraged, high risk businesses that have to generate massive revenues based on massively high costs (compensation).  A Tobin tax on transactions to pay for future failure (large unwinds) seems a small price to keep the industry pretty much intact despite a near death experience in 2008. 

 

I liked the way the world looked before 2007…I benefited personally no doubt.  But I for one can’t believe that anything short of a massive reinvention of banking to Glass-Steagall world is going to yield any different outcome than the one we just went through. How can any reasonable person ever feel confident in the banking system again if it’s key components remain in place. 

 

And those pushing for real overhaul like Volcker, face serious pushback from the very pro-Wall Street likes of Geithner and Summers.  If anything the current approach of regulators and US government to reforming the banking system reminds me of how Toyota is dealing with its unintended acceleration problem…now that I think if it the very name has an eerie application to 2008.

 

David Gilmore

 

Daily Forex Market News
Forex news reports can be found on the forex research headlines page below. Here you will find real-time forex market news reports provided by respected contributors of currency trading information. Daily forex market news, weekly forex research and monthly forex news features can be found here.

Forex News
Real-time forex market news reports and features providing other currency trading information can be accessed by clicking on any of the headlines below. At the top of the forex blog page you will find the latest forex trading information. Scroll down the page if you are looking for less recent currency trading information. Scroll to the bottom of fx blog headlines and click on the link for past reports on forex. Currency world news reports from previous years can be found on the left sidebar under "FX Archives."

Most Popular Links



Forex Forum Directory

Live Trading Forums
Forex Forum
Forex + Live Forex Rates
Forex Forum + Live FX Rates
Futures Forum
GVI Forex (by subscription)
Political Forum
Open Forum

 

Contact us if you need advice in selecting a broker. We will be pleased to assist.






Global-View.com Chart Gallery
09/9/2010                
20:08 GMT   2yr bp 10yr bp DJIA 10427 47
USDX 82.64 3 0.55 4 2.74 8 S&P 1105 7
  USD vs.     Fixed Income   NAS 2238 10
EUR 1.2705 12 0.70 7 2.34 4 DAX 6222 57
GBP 1.5435 31 0.69 3 3.04 5 FTSE 5494 64
CHF 1.0149 31 0.44 3 1.42 3 SMI 6425 0
JPY 83.80 8 0.14 0 1.13 -1 NIK 9098 74
CAD 1.0335 40 1.48 12 2.98 5 TSE 12003 85
AUD 0.9233 67 4.54 8 4.93 6 ASX 4582 45
NZD 0.7250 28 HSI 21167 78
CNY 6.7830 120 SSEC 2656 42
  EUR vs.     GBP vs.       AUD vs
JPY 106.47 20 JPY 129.35 38 GBP 1.6714 155
GBP 82.31 9 CHF 156.65 16 CAD 0.9542 30
CHF 1.2894 27 CAD 1.5955 92 CHF 1.0663 11
AUD 1.3759 111   JPY vs.   NZD 1.2727 48
CAD 1.3132 62 CHF 82.57 33 Commodities
  CHF vs. CAD 1.233 -37 Gold 1244.4 10.85
CAD 1.0663 114 AUD 77.39 51 WTI 74.28 0.37
                   
                   




Extensive Free Daily Technical Chart Points

9/9/2010 EURUSD USDJPY USDCHF GBPUSD USDCAD
Close 1.2703 83.89 1.0150 1.5442 1.0331
High 1.2767 84.02 1.0169 1.5477 1.0394
Low 1.2665 83.50 1.0100 1.5376 1.0302
Mov avgs EURUSD USDJPY USDCHF GBPUSD USDCAD
5 day 1.2775 84.04 1.0131 1.5428 1.0379
10 day 1.2758 84.28 1.0164 1.5431 1.0471
20 day 1.2757 84.75 1.0265 1.5489 1.0465
50 day 1.2847 86.10 1.0411 1.5475 1.0416
100 day 1.2664 88.80 1.0813 1.5132 1.0392
200 day 1.3296 89.89 1.0671 1.5406 1.0385
Pivots 1.2712 83.80 1.0140 1.5432 1.0342

Source: Free Global-View FX Database

Disclaimer    Privacy Policy    Contact    Site Map


Forex Forum
Forex Trading Forum
Forex Forum + forex rates
Forex Forum Archives
Forex Forum RSS
Free Registration

Trading Forums
Currency Forum Guide
Forum Directory
Open Forum
Futures Forum
Political Forum
Forex Brokers
Compare Forex Brokers
Forex Broker News
Forex Broker Hotline
Forex Trading Tools
Currency Trading Tools
Forex Database
FX Chart Points
Risk/Carry Trade Chart Points
Economic Calendar
Quicklinks to Economic Data
Currency Futures Swaps
Fibonacci Calculator
Currency Futures Calculator

Forex Education
Forex Learning Center
FX Trading Basics Course
Forex Trading Course
Forex Trading Handbook

Forex Analysis
Forex Forecasts
Interest Rate Forecasts
Central Bank Forecasts

FX Charts and Quotes
Live FX Rates
Live Global Market Quotes
Live Forex Charts
US Dollar Index Chart
Global Chart Gallery
Daily Market Tracker
Forex News
Forex Blog
Forex News
Forex Blog Archives
Forex News RSS
Forex Services
Forex Products
GVI Forex
Free Trials
FX Bookstore
FX Jobs and Careers
Jobs USA
Jobs UK
Jobs Canada

 

WARNING: FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRADING AND INVESTMENT IN DERIVATIVES CAN BE VERY SPECULATIVE AND MAY RESULT IN LOSSES AS WELL AS PROFITS. FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND DERIVATIVES TRADING IS NOT SUITABLE FOR MANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND ONLY RISK CAPITAL SHOULD BE APPLIED. THE WEBSITE DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT SPECIAL INVESTMENT GOALS, THE FINANCIAL SITUATION OR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL USERS. YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION AND CONSULT YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISORS AS TO THE SUITABILITY TO YOUR SITUATION PRIOR TO MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR ENTERING INTO ANY TRANSACTIONS.

Copyright ©1996-2010 Global-View. All Rights Reserved.
Hosting and Development by Blue 105